Archives de Tag: Heloise Bourdon

Mayerling : bilan tardif

Les Balletotos se sont cotisés pour voir trois distributions différentes du Mayerling de Sir Kenneth MacMillan. Tels des boas constrictors qui auraient mis du temps à digérer leur proie volumineuse, ils se résolvent enfin à vous en rendre compte. Fenella est enragée, Cléopold assommé et James… juste tombé sur la tête?

*

 *                                               *

JamesJames : représentation du 30 octobre 2024.

J’ai trouvé la recette pour passer une bonne soirée à coup sûr : voir le spectacle à travers les yeux de quelqu’un d’autre. J’ai longtemps hésité à revoir Mayerling, dont j’avais fait une overdose lors de son entrée au répertoire de l’Opéra de Paris. Pour cette année, une revoyure serait le maximum. J’ai même failli revendre ma place, mais une charmante amie qui avait pourtant une journée bien chargée a insisté pour découvrir l’œuvre, et je ne pouvais pas la laisser en plan. Et me voilà arpentant tous les couloirs et escaliers de Garnier – et il y en a de lépreux – pour narrer les nombreuses péripéties de chaque acte, détailler les interactions entre les personnages, donner des pistes pour reconnaître les perruques, tenter de rabouter tout cela à la géopolitique de l’Empire austro-hongrois, avant qu’il soit temps de nous faufiler en troisièmes loges.
Et là, miracle, la magie du spectacle opère. À chaque instant, je vérifie que les épisodes annoncés (« tu vas voir, dans la scène du bal, Rodolphe danse, non pas avec son épouse, mais avec la sœur de celle-ci ! ») sont compréhensibles, et du coup, suis attentif au moindre détail (tiens, je ne souvenais pas ce qui déclenche cette entorse à l’étiquette : sa mère, déjà, lui manifeste une horrible froideur). C’est comme si l’œil brillant de ma voisine contaminait mon regard. De blasé, me voilà neuf.
Oh, tout n’est pas parfait. Les quatre zigues qui harcèlent le prince pour lui faire embrasser la cause de la Hongrie manquent de rudesse et ne dansent pas toujours ensemble (ils seront plus à leur aise à l’auberge au deuxième acte ; il s’agit de damoiseaux Busserolles, Lopes Gomes, Marylanowski et Simon).

P1220748

Mathieu Ganio et Héloïse Bourdon. Répétition à l’amphithéâtre Olivier Messian. 12 octobre 2024.

Mais il y a Mathieu Ganio, dont on voit cette saison les derniers feux ; le danseur-acteur donne toute la palette de son art dans le rôle du prince Rodolphe. On voit à travers lui la morgue, la rage, les doutes, la névrose. À chaque pas de deux – et il y en a de nombreux – il adapte son style à sa partenaire et à la situation de cœur de son personnage : dragueur insolent avec la princesse Louise (Ambre Chiarcosso), il est las mais sensuel avec son ancien collage Marie Larisch (Naïs Duboscq), avant de se faire effrayant et glaçant de violence dédaigneuse avec son épouse Stéphanie (Inès McIntosh très touchante en fétu de paille). Approchant sa mère (Héloïse Bourdon, toute de grâce avec tout le monde et toute de glace avec lui), on le voir redevenir enfant. Au deuxième acte, lors de la scène de la taverne, il fait montre d’une élégance inentamée aussi bien pour son solo de caractère que lors du duo avec Mitzi Caspar (une Clara Mousseigne un poil trop élégante).

Alors que la névrose du prince progresse, Mary Vetsera prend son ascendant : Léonore Baulac incarne avec une crâne détermination le seul personnage qui dialogue d’égale à égal avec le prince ; le passage où elle inverse les rôles (Rodolphe avait terrorisé Stéphanie avec un pistolet, elle fait de même) scelle le pacte de mort qui occupera le dernier acte. Dans le rôle de Bratfisch, serviteur fidèle de Rodolphe, Jack Gasztowtt est presque trop grand et élégant, mais il habite avec précision sa partition, et avec sensibilité son rôle d’amuseur (2e acte) qu’on ne regarde plus (3e acte).

*

 *                                               *

cléopold2Cléopold : représentation du 5 novembre 2024.

Sans doute parce que je n’avais pas comme l’heureux James pour sa soirée une charmante voisine à mes côtés, je n’ai pas eu d’épiphanie face au mastodonte Mayerling. Le ballet apparait toujours avec ses mêmes gros défauts, sa myriade de personnages accessoires, notamment féminins, le tout encore aggravé par cette spécialité de l’Opéra de distribuer les rôles plus selon la hiérarchie de la compagnie que selon la maturité physique des interprètes. C’est ainsi que le 5 novembre, dans son pas de deux du « dos à dos » avec Rodolphe, Célia Drouy, par ailleurs fine interprète, a l’air d’être la petite sœur de son partenaire et non sa mère. Sylvia Saint-Martin tire son épingle du jeu en Marie Larisch. Sa pointe de sécheresse donne à l’intrigante comtesse une image vipérine qui s’accorde avec le premier pas de deux qu’elle a avec le prince héritier tout en enroulements-déroulements – notamment le double tour en l’air achevé en une attitude enserrant le partenaire- . Marine Ganio est quant à elle très touchante ; aussi bien dans son solo de jeune mariée où, malgré les signes contraires donnés pendant le bal, elle espère encore trouver dans le prince héritier un mari, que dans le pas de deux « monstre à deux têtes » de la chambre nuptiale.

P1220766

Marine Ganio (Sophie), Francesco Mura (Bratfisch) et (? ahhh La confusion des personnages multiples et vides)

On l’aura compris, on se raccroche au pas de deux comme un marin naufragé aux planches éparses du navire englouti. MacMillan reste un maître incontesté du genre. Et qu’importe si chacun des personnages féminins qu’il dépeint à part peut-être Mary Vetsera se voit refuser toute progression dramatique. Chacune d’entre elles reste l’allégorie d’un type de relation avec le prince héritier.

C’est pourquoi on ne voit guère en Mayerling qu’une tentative ratée de surenchérir sur le succès de Manon, créé quatre ans auparavant. La scène la plus emblématique de cet échec est à ce titre celle de la taverne qui tente de transposer, de manière pataude, l’acte « chez Madame » de Manon. En effet, on y trouve une myriade de prostituées qui se dandinent et se chamaillent. Un personnage masculin secondaire exécute une variation aussi bouffonne qu’acrobatique (Francesco Mura donne à ce numéro de Bratfisch une jolie bravura, entre relâché –les roulis d’épaules- et énergie coups de fouet des sauts). Un personnage secondaire féminin danse une variation sensuelle (Clara Mousseigne atteint les critères techniques du rôle sans parvenir à donner corps à sa Mizzi Caspar). Un quatuor de messieurs fait des grands jetés dans tous les sens (Les Hongrois de carton-pâte qui jusque-là ressemblaient plutôt à des polichinelles sortant de leur boite – MacMillan aurait mieux fait de ne pas aborder le volet politique si c’était pour le traiter de cette manière). La police vient enfin gâcher la fête.

Seulement voilà, dans Manon, la scène chez Madame vient faire avancer l’action : des Grieux, voit sa fiancée volage revenir à lui. Lescaut, qui favorise ce retour de flamme après avoir été la cause même du départ de l’héroïne, perd la vie. Manon est arrêtée et va être déportée en Louisiane. Dans Mayerling, la scène n’apporte pas grand-chose au développement de l’action. Que nous importe que Rodolphe propose le suicide à Mizzi Caspar quand la chorégraphie ne nous a suggéré aucune vraie intimité, même sensuelle, entre les deux personnages. Peut-être aurait-il dû proposer le marché à Bratfisch. Cela aurait, peut-être, donné une raison d’exister à ce personnage accessoire se résumant à ses deux variations.

Invariablement, cette scène inutile émousse suffisamment mon attention pour me trouver indifférent à un moment pivot du ballet, celui du salon de la Baronne Vetsera où, durant un tirage de cartes truqué, Marie Larisch finit de tourner la tête à la jeune écervelée Mary Vetsera – le rôle féminin principal- qui, depuis le début du ballet, ne faisait que passer.

Il faut donc attendre la moitié de la soirée pour rentrer dans le vif du sujet et c’est sans compter encore deux autres scènes parfaitement inutiles : la réception au palais de la Hofburg où on nous inflige tous les proches et illégitimes de la famille impériale (en amant de Sissi, Pablo Legasa est grossièrement sous employé) et la scène à la campagne  (beaucoup de décors et de figurations pour un coup de fusil).

C’est un peu comme si MacMillan, qui avait su condenser la Manon de l’abbé Prévost, n’avait pas su sélectionner les épisodes les plus significatifs qui ont conduit le prince au tombeau. Un ballet n’est pas un livre d’Histoire et multiplier les notes de bas de page ne fait assurément pas une bonne histoire.

P1220781

Hohyun Kang et Paul Marque (Mary et Rodolphe).

Mais venons-en –enfin !- aux personnages principaux. En Rodolphe, Paul Marque, assez compact physiquement, torturé et introverti, nous crée des frayeurs au début du ballet. Il cherche ses pieds lors de sa première variation (ses chevilles tremblent sur les pirouettes et même en échappés). Le pas de deux avec la sœur de Stéphanie (Luna Peigné) est un peu périlleux avec des décentrés ratés. On craint un peu pour la jeune danseuse. Cela s’améliore par la suite. Paul Marque joue très bien la maladresse et l’inconfort. Il semble déplacé au milieu de tous ces ors et ces fastes. Il est même touchant dans la scène de chasse, avalé qu’il est par son lourd manteau et sa toque. Il est aussi un morphinomane poignant mais convainc moins en Hamlet sur Danube, dans ses confrontations avec le crâne.

Pour le drame, on se repose alors sur Hohyun Kang qui, assez charmante et lumineuse dans ses premières scènes de presque figuration, se mue assez vite en liane à l’élasticité toxique. Sa Mary est un petit animal qui ronronne et griffe tout à tour. A l’acte 3, la scène de la mort, avec ses portés-synthèses de tous les autres pas de deux avec les autres interprètes féminines, est d’un effet monstrueux.

Mary-Hohyun accrédite l’idée d’un vrai sacrifice consenti. Elle semble rester complètement dans l’exaltation jubilatoire du suicide romantique. Je préfère la version où la jeune fille recule au dernier moment et est emportée par la folie de Rodolphe qu’elle a activement encouragée. Le choix présenté par Kang et Marque est cependant très valide.

Mais Dieu qu’il faut patienter pour en arriver là ; et que de fois on a cru sombrer dans les bras de Morphée avant ce dénouement.

P1220778

Hoyun Kang (Mary), Paul Marque (Rodolphe) et Silvia Saint-Martin (Marie Larisch).

*

 *                                               *

FenellaFenella : soirée du 13 novembre 2024

SHOOT! 

Mayerling by Sir Kenneth MacMillan, Paris Opera Ballet at the Palais Garnier, November 13th, 2024. 

Even if you put a gun to my head, I will never ever go see this ballet again. 

The potential dramatic arc keeps shooting itself in the foot as hordes of pointless people keep disturbing the crime scene. This cacophony of characters only serves to distract and, worse, confuse an audience unversed in the minutiae of minor late 19th century Central European history.  

During the early scene at a ball, once again I just kept trying to guess who’s who, as did the two women sitting in front of me who were leaning in and actively chatting to each other. “Archduchess Gisela,” seriously? Who?  Who cares? Who even cared back then? The character is a non-character, a company member who was just wasted playing a titular extra. (At least 18 roles have names in the cast list).

 So there. Now back to the topic at hand. What I saw. And it didn’t start well. 

Then, after having been absolutely gobsmaked by an Emperor Franz Joseph doing heavy squats in second when he was supposed to be leading a Viennese waltz with upright elegance, I started to sink down in my seat. I will not out the very young dancer who perpetrated this assault on the waltz as either he was not, or was seriously badly, coached. Clearly, more attention was paid to his wig and costume. If you are going to be so historically correct that you give specific names to minor characters…maybe you should pay attention to little details such as how a waltz is properly danced? 

P1220759

Curtain calls. The too many characters

Oh yes. The leads.  

Germain Louvet as Crown Prince Rudolph nailed it. He’s grown into his talent. He’s gone from being a youthfully pretty star into this manfully expressive artist, all without losing a sliver of his lines and elan. He’s really in the zone right now and, despite the fact that I think this ballet is a total waste, he made it work for us in the audience. From his first entrance as Rudolf, Louvet set out a complicated but readable persona: already anguished, brusque; very proper manners if required but clearly not a fool, not naive (and not as mad as others, such as his mother, assume he is).  

 As his mother, Empress Elizabeth, Camille Bon did impose a calm presence. You could tell she was his mother from scene to scene, no matter what the hat or hair. In their only intimate encounter, the one in her bedroom, there was no doubt that this woman hated to be touched by her son. The little kiss goodbye on the forehead never fails to pin down what kind of mother the dancer has shaped. Alas, later on, when Elizabeth dances pointlessly with a lover who suddenly pops up in the deserted ballroom, neither radiated charisma (not to mention desire). Why not just ERASE Sissi’s pointless boyfriend “Colonel Bay Middleton” Cast member #9? I wanted to remove him at gunpoint. No one in the audience has ever been able to tell who the hell he is supposed to be. 

As Rudolph’s battered bride, Countess Stephanie, Inès McIntosh proved naively helpless, but not hopeless and definitely not a ninny. You started to cheer for her: if only her new husband could tell that she’s just as melancholic as he is! Just not as crazy. And if only her new husband could see that her body does match his in lines and energy. Both Louvet and McIntosh have an unassuming way of lifting and extending their legs that makes the high lines seem natural. Neither of the two kicks or flings their legs about needlessly. Their extensions soar up softly and take time to soak in the music. They’d make a nice couple, given a chance.  

Heloïse Bourdon, whom I had once seen playing Rudolfs’s mother with cold fire, was unrecognizable (in the best way) here as Countess Larisch. Healthy, sane, pragmatic – you almost could imagine that the Habsburg Empire wouldn’t have fallen if she’d been Franz Joseph’s Pompadour rather than Rudolph’s enabler. Actually, her countess seemed more wry and disabused than enabling. Yes, a Pompadour: elegant, smart, knows someone will always hate her for where she comes from. 

img_9106

Mayerling. Curtain Call.

By first intermission, I was already thinking about the busy 1953 Warner Brother’s cartoon Duck Amuck, where Bugs Bunny progressively erases Daffy Duck. And now, please, for Act Two: 

CUT the tavern scene with Mizzi Caspar, which provides zero dramatic purpose or emotional payoff. I mean, this endless scene finally fizzles out when Mizzi — whom we have not seen before …and will never see again – gets taken home by another man who probably has a name in the program? He might be #10 or #11, who cares? Waving papers around (ooh, plot clue) is something to be saved for a close-up in a BBC miniseries.  

As Mizzi, however, Marine Ganio infused her persona with the voluptuous Viennese charm of what they call “Mädls:” « Girlies » with hearts of brass.  

Some can even manage, like Ganio, to be one of the boys when dancing to Liszt’s Devil’s Waltz with four pointless Hungarians.  [Don’t even ask me about the score. I want to burn it]. OK, maybe do not FULLY ERASE the tavern scene entirely but please:  just EDIT OUT these “Hungarian” Jack In The Boxes from the entire ballet. I was rather annoyed that James did not find them rough and rustic enough. Le Sigh, they are supposed to be noblemen aka elegantly sinuous whisperers, not tough guys. 

Louvet’s Rudoph was the happiest and least tormented when dancing with Marine Ganio’s Mizzi, even when he was pulling her in too manaically. Their yearning to stretch matched, their arms – even when in tight couronnes — matched. There was a story ready to be told here, but that would have been a different ballet. 

Please CUT the ennnndless scene of the Habsburg Fireworks and thereby CUT the out-of-place diva impersonating “Katharina Schratt”, Franz Joseph’s actress mistress, as she sings to boring effect to live piano accompaniment.  And CRUMPLE UP AND THROW OUT: The Hunt, oh god please. OK, Rudolph killing someone, by accident or on purpose,  is based on a true story. As the guy already is a drug and sex addict, syphilitic, and just plain nuts, does this excuse to make a prop gun go pop…add anything to the narrative?  

Most of all: CUT CUT CUT Bratfisch, the loyal coachman, OR at least please give him enough to do to make him identifiable! As is, he is a 5th  Jack In The Box, but a lonely one who dances alone. As this character is 8th out of 18 in the playbill you might not notice that he was the first guy you saw on the snowy stage of Act One Scene One. Antoine Kirscher, eh? Didn’t he also get cast as the naughty coachman (aka the guy with a horsewhip) in Neumeier’s La Dame aux camellias? Here Kirscher couldn’t quite make as much of a sassy statement in the endless tavern scene, hampered by the fact you had no idea who he was supposed to be. Now seriously dated Groucho Marx references don’t help the younger ones in the audience.  Nor could you tell that the sad guy in the last scene in the churchyard was someone you’d seen before. Even with two solos, it’s a non-role and no dancer, none, has been given enough to chew on to really make it work.  

Oh, and by the way, one of the many pretty girls who’d been popping in and out for at least an act and a half then turns out to be the starring female role: Mary Vetsera, the last of Rudoph’s mistresses, the only one who turns out willing to die with/for him. Bluenn Battistoni. Clearly not naïve: she’s a girl of our time who has seen too much perversion on the internet that she thinks  doing  “x”(spellcheck just censored me) on a first date is normal. Battistoni’s Mary was clearly not a drama queen with death wish either. Just a girl…and perhaps Louvet’s Rudolph was a bit too careful with his ballerina during the final flippy- flappy too-much is not enough MacMillan partnering.   

Honestly, by the time the action got around to Mary, at some point after the tavern or  the hunt, I must have been weirdly smiling: I was now thinking about that 1952 cartoon “Rabbit Seasoning” where Bugs asks his nemesis whether Elmer Fudd should shoot him now or shoot him later. If this ballet ever shows up in the Paris Opéra repertory again, I swear I shall scream, like Daffy Duck, “I demand that you shoot me now!

Commentaires fermés sur Mayerling : bilan tardif

Classé dans Humeurs d'abonnés, Retours de la Grande boutique

My Nights at the POB (2024 Spring / Summer collection)

A classical ballet, just like a classic book you’ve reread many – many ! – times, almost never fails to delight you again when you rediscover it. Here are some of my most recent ones at the Paris Opera ballet.

Hannah O’Neill and Germain Louvet: a most pleasant discovery

P1200303Don Quichotte on March 27th

For a while now, I’d been unconvinced by the pairing of Hannah O’Neill with Hugo Marchand. His large presence overwhelmed her and their lines and musicality did not match. He made her look small and quite pallid, which is odd considering that the smaller Gilbert never did. Maybe it’s because Gilbert is clearly a fighter while O’Neill’s persona is more demure?

But who else could she dance with? Germain Louvet? Pairing them in Don Q on March 27th proved splendid: their lines and timing and reflexes completely in synch. They even giddily broke the line of their wrists exactly when the music went “tada.”

But Don Q is a comedy.

Up until now, for me, Germain Louvet only lacked one thing as an artist: gravitas. It was impossible to find fault with his open-hearted technique, but somehow I always got the feeling that he wasn’t quite convinced when he played a prince. Some part of him remained too much a stylish young democrat of our times.

His acting could reminded me of how you tried to keep a straight face when you got cast as Romeo at an all-girl’s high school.  You tried really, really hard, but it just wasn’t you.

P1200201

Germain Louvet (Basilio) et Hannah O’Neill (Kitri).

*                                        *

P1200348

Giselle. Saluts

Giselle on May 28th

Then something happened when Louvet stepped out on the stage on May 28th. Here was a man whose self-assurance seemed worldlier, tougher, critical distance gone. Within seconds in his pantomime with Wilfried, Louvet “was” that Old-World well-mannered man used to being obeyed and getting what he wants at any restaurant. I was convinced.

And it all came together when Hannah O’Neill answered his knock-knock.  A healthy, normal girl with no secrets who has clearly been warned about men but who has decided – on some level to this Albrecht’s surprise – that he is a good man.

Everything about O’Neill’s Giselle, from her first solo onwards, breathed restraint and modesty. She was the kind of girl who speaks so softly you cannot help but lean in to her.  Louvet’s Albrecht clearly felt this.

Once again, every little danced detail matched. But more than that, these two were literally inside the same mental space. Both of them reacted strongly to Berthe’s narrative:  O’Neill spellbound and Louvet taking that cautionary tale personally, as if Giselle’s mother had just put a hex on him. Later, when Giselle shows him her big new diamond pendant, Louvet managed the degrees of that multileveled reaction of “I must not tell her she has a scorpion crawling on her chest just yet.” And none of this felt like he was trying to steal the spotlight. He was really in the moment, as was she.

Antonio Conforti’s Hilarion had also been believable all along, his mild state of panic at the growing romance evolving into fear for her life. (His Second Act panic will be equally believable). When Conforti had rushed in as if shot out of a cannon to put a stop to the romance, you could see how Giselle knew that he was no monster. This nice Giselle’s inability to disbelieve anyone made her mad scene all the more poignant. No chewing of the scenery, her scene’s discreet details once again made us want to lean in and listen.  Giselle’s body and mind breaking down at the same time was reflected in the way O’Neill increasingly lost control, even the use, of her arms. She took me directly back to one awful day when I was crying so hard I couldn’t breathe and walked straight into a wall. Utter stunned silence in the auditorium.

Louvet’s differently shaped shock fit the character he had developed. You could absolutely believe in the astonishment of this well-bred man who had never even put one foot wrong at a reception, much less been accused of murder.

Woman, Please let me explain
I never meant to cause you sorrow or pain
So let me tell you again and again and again

I love you, yeah-yeah
Now and forever*

In Act II, you had no need of binoculars to know that the regal Roxane Stojanov  was the only possible Queen of the Wilis. Her dance filled the stage. Those tiny little bourrées travelled far and as if pulled by a string. She seemed to be movingNOTmoving. Her reaction at the end of the act to the church bells chiming dawn — a slow turn of the head in haughty disbelief — made it clear that this Queen’s anger at one man, all men, would never die. Clearly, she will be back in the forest glade tomorrow night, ready for more.

I was touched by the way Louvet’s Albrecht was not only mournful but frightened from the start. It’s too easy to walk out on the stage and say “just kill me already.” It’s another thing to walk out on the stage and say “I’ve never been so completly confused in my entire life.”

Woman, I can hardly express
My mixed emotions at my thoughtlessness
After all, I’m forever in your debt…*

P1220482

Hannah O’Neill et Germain Louvet (curtain call)

*                                        *

P1220593Le Lac des cygnes on June 27th

O’Neill’s unusual interpretation of Odette – under-swanned and unmannered – reminded me of Julia Roberts saying ,” “I’m just a girl standing in front of a boy asking him to love her.” No diva here. O’Neill’s swan/princess had not only been captured but promoted queen against her will. All she wants is to be seen as a normal girl. I think this take on the role might have put out some in the audience nourished by that awful horror movie’s over the top clichés. Once again I fell for the rich nuances in this ballerina’s demure and understated authority.

And here was Germain Louvet again! Elegant, well-mannered, gracious, and absolutely un-melancholy. His prince was not self-involved, yet regal with a kind of natural elegance that set him apart. I’ve met people like that.

Louvet’s at ease Siegfried just wants to dance around with his friends and has never thought much about the future.  Often the Queen Mother scene just seems like an intertitle in a silent movie: basic information needed to make a plot point. The acting can be light, as in Paris the dancers cast as queen mothers are mostly ten to fifteen years younger than their sons. Young Margaux Gaudy-Talazac, however, had believable authority and presence.  I cannot put my finger on exactly what she and Louvet did and when, but what developed was clearly the Freudian vision Nureyev had had for this ballet in the first place. “Why do you want me to go find a woman? I’m just fine here with you, mommy.” This Siegfried’s rejection of the Act Three princesses was preordained no matter what. What a pity, then, that Thomas Docquir’s flavourless Wolfgang and stiff Rothbart gave all the others little to work against.

Back to no matter what… But what if a woman unlike all other women actually exists? Hey, what if even dozens of them are lurking out there just outside the windows? Louvet’s tiny gesture, stopping to stroke a tutu as if to check it were for real as he progressed in through the hedgerow of swan maidens, made these thoughts come to life.

O’Neill and Louvet’s courtly encounters were like the water: no added ingredients, pure and liquid. O’Neill kept her hands simple – the way you actually do when you swim– and Louvet gently tried to get in close enough to take a sip but she kept slipping away from him. As he gently and with increasing confidence pushed down her arms into an embrace, you could sense that she couldn’t help but evaporate.

Their lines and timing matched once again. But I wondered if some in the audience didn’t find this delicately feminine and recognizably human Odette too low energy, not flappy enough? But she’s a figment of HIS imagination after all! This Siegfried was in no need of a hysteric and obviously desired someone calm, not fierce. [This brings me back to what doesn’t work in Marchand/O’Neill. He may appreciate her in the studio, but on stage he needs a dancer who resists him].

As Act Three took off, I found myself bemused by when I do focus, and when I don’t focus, on how this production’s Siegfried is dressed in bridal white. Louvet’s character was indeed both as annoyed and then as anguished as an adolescent. No other betrayed Siegfried in a long time has buried his face in his mother’s skirts with such fervor.

Nota Bene: All nights, in the czardas, the legs go too high. The energy goes up when it should push forward. This ancient Hungarian dance is not a cancan.

As Odile, O’Neill once again went for the subtle route. Her chimera played at re-enacting being as evanescent as water, now punctuated with little flicks of the wrist. Louvet reacted in the moment. “She’s acting strangely. Maybe I just didn’t have time last night to see this more swinging side to her?”

In Act Four, O’Neill’s Odette was no longer under a spell, just a girl who wants to be loved. No other Siegfried in a long time has dashed in with more speed and determination. As they wound and unwound against each other in their final pas de deux of doom I wondered whether I’d ever seen Louvet’s always lovely partnering be this protective. The only word for his partnering and persona: maternal.

It wasn’t a flashy performance, but I was moved to the core.

And woman
Hold me close to your heart
However distant, don’t keep us apart
After all, it is written in the stars*

*John Lennon, “Woman.” (1980)

 

P1220592

Le Lac des cygnes. Hannah O’Neill (Odette/Odile) et Germain Louvet (Siegfried).

*

 *                                       *

Sae-Eun Park : I found her and then lost her again

Gisele May 17 Sae-Eun Park and Germain Louvet

P1220423During Giselle, what I’ve been looking for finally happened. Before my eyes Sae-Un Park evolved from being a dutiful baby ballerina into a mature artist. And her partner, Germain Louvet (again!) whom I’d often found to be a bit “lite” as far as drama with another goes, came to play a real part in this awakening.

But this was not the same Albrecht, to boot. From his first entrance and throughout his dialogues with Wilfried, words from an oldie began to dance around at the back of my brain:

Well, she was just seventeen
You know what I mean
And the way she looked
Was way beyond compare
So how could I dance with another
Ooh, when I saw her standing there?*

I almost didn’t recognize Park. All the former technical mastery was still in place but it suddenly began to breathe and flow in a manner I had not seen before. She came alive. All her movement extended through a newfound energy that reached beyond from toes and fingertips and unblocked her already delicate lines. Her pantomime, her character, became vivid rather than textbook. I’ve been waiting for Park to surprise herself (and us) and here she demonstrated a new kind of abandon, of inflection, of fullness of body.

Well, she looked at me
And I, I could see
That before too long
I’d fall in love with her
She wouldn’t dance with another
Ooh, when I saw her standing there*

Throughout the ballet, Louvet and Park danced for each other and not for themselves (which had been a weakness for both to grow out of, I think). Park’s acting came from deep inside. From inside out for once, not demonstrated from without. During her mad scene, I simply put my notebook down.

Act 2 got off to a… start. Sylvia Saint-Martin clearly worked on controlling all the technical detail but danced as harshly as is her wont for now. The disconnect between her arabesque, torso, and abrupt arms, the way she rushes the music, the way her jumps travel but don’t really go anywhere…everything about her dance and stage presence just feels aggressive and demonstrative from start to stop. She finally put some biglyness into her last manège, but it was too late for me.

Well, my heart went « boom »
When I crossed that room
And I held her hand in mine

Oh we danced through the night
And we held each other tight*

There was a different kind of emotional violence to Germain Louvet’s first entrance, reacting to THIS Giselle. Along with the flowers, he carried a clear connection to the person from Act One onto the stage. You don’t always get the feeling that Giselle and Albrecht actually see each other from the backs of their heads, and here it happened. Both rivalled each other in equally feathery and tremulous beats. Their steps kept echoing each other’s. Park’s Giselle was readably trying to hold on to her memories, and moved her artistry beyond technique.  This newfound intensity for her was what I’d long hoped for. I am still impressed by how visible she made Giselle’s internal struggle as the dark forces increasingly took control of her being and forced her to fade.

I left the theatre humming as if the thrum of a cello and the delicate lift of the harp were tapping on my shoulder.

Now I’ll never dance with another, Ooh.*

*The Beatles, “How Could I Dance With Another?” (1963)

P1200388

Sae-Eun Park (Giselle) et Germain Louvet (Albrecht)

*                                        *

Swan Lake, Sae-Un Park with Paul Marque on June 28th

P1220597However, this performance saw the ballerina go back into comfort mode.

In Act 1 Pablo Legasa, as the tutor Wolfgang aka Rothbart, instantly asserted his authority over Siegfried and the audience understood in a way that it hadn’t with  Docquir whose presence didn’t still does not cross the footlights . Legasa’s tutor gleefully set up the about-to be-important crossbow as he slid it into Marque’s hands, just as he would later use that cape better than Batman. Most Rothbarts manipulate the Loïe Fuller outfit like a frenemy, at best.

The little dramatic nuances matter. Whereas Louvet’s Siegfried hadn’t really wanted to rock the boat much during Act 1 — so to be fair Docquir didn’t have that much to do — tonight Legasa repeatedly denied Paul Marque, whose Siegfried is more of a regular guy, any escape or release without express permission.

Paul Marque doesn’t possess the naturally elongated lines of Germain Louvet, but that isn’t a problem for me. Marque’s vibe feels more 19th century: dancing at its best: a restrained yet elevated 90 degrees back then was the equivalent of 180 now and every step he makes is as clearly outlined as if it popped out of an engraving. The way he worked up towards making the last arabesque in his solo arch and yearn gave us all we wanted as to insight into the internal trauma of the character.

In Act 2, Sae-Eun Park finally arrived to the delight of her fans.  She gave a very traditional and accomplished classic rendering of Odette, replete with big open back, swanny boneless wings/arms, took her time with the music and became a beautiful abstract object in Siegfried’s arms. Her solo was perfectly executed. Could I ask for anything more? Maybe?

You have to make it work for you. O’Neill remained a woman, a princess trapped in some kind of clammy wetsuit and gummy gloves that covered her fingers. Park outlined and gave a by the book performance of the expected never having been a human swan. But at least now she dances from the inside out and her arms do fully engage in dialogue with her back.

I loved the way this Siegfried reacted to all the swans. “What? You mean there’s more of them?” Marque, as in Act One, then chiselled a beautifully uplifted variation that felt true to Nureyev’s vision in the way a synthesized centeredness (thesis) encounters and surmounts a myriad of unexpected changes in direction (antithesis). Very Hegelian, was Marque’s synthesis.  Bravo, he made philosophical meanderings come alive with his body.

These lovers are lulled into the idea that escape is possible and will happen soon.

In Act 3, Legasa continues to lead the narrative. He is clearly whispering instructions into Odile’s earbud while also utilizing his cape and hands as if they were remote control.. For once Rothbart’s solo did not seem like a gratuitous interruptionsreplete with awkward landings. The pas de deux can in fact be a real pas de trois if that third wheel unspools his steps and stops and brings out the underlying waltzy rhythm of the music. Legassa tossed off those double tours with flippant ease and evil father-figure panache. Nureyev would have loved it.

Park’s Odile? Marque recognized his Odette instantly. Park did everything right but only seemed to come into her own in her solo (from where I was sitting). Even if her extended leg went up high and she spinned like a top, at the end of the pas de the audience didn’t roar.

“When Siegfried discovered he has both betrayed and been betrayed, Louvet, like a little boy, he wrapped his arms desperately tight around his mother.” Why did I write that in my notebook at the exact moment when I was watching Paul Marque in the same pantomime? I don’t quite remember, but I think it was because “mama” wasn’t what anything was about for him.

In the last Act, while Legasa acted up a storm, Marque remained nice and manly. The night before, Germain Louvet had really put all his energy into seeking Odette and fighting back against the forces of darkness. He really ran after what he wanted. Marque is maybe just not as wild by nature. Or maybe he just stayed in tune with Park? In Act 4, Park did fluttery. Lovely fluttery arms and tippy-toes that stayed on the music and worked for the audience. I observed but didn’t feel involved.

For me, only Pablo Legasa made me shiver during this Park/Marque Swan Lake. I found myself wondering what Park would have done IF a more passionate dancer like Legasa – as Louvet had been recently for her Giselle – had challenged her more. Now that I think back, Marque, too, had hit a high dramatic level when recently paired with Ould-Braham in Giselle. Maybe it’s time to end “ParkMarque.”  I like them both more and more, just not together.

P1220546

Le Lac des cygnes. Sae-Eun Park (Odette/Odile) et Paul Marque (Siegfried).

*

 *                                       *

Héloïse Bourdon: The Treasure that’s been hiding in plain sight.

You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one*

P1220572Swan Lake, Héloïse Bourdon and Jerémy-Loup Quer, on July 12th

Then on July 12th, something long anticipated didn’t happen. Again. As she had way back then on December 26th, 2022, Heloïse Bourdon gave yet another stellar performance as Odette/Odile in Le Lac des Cygnes. At the end, as the audience roared, so many of us expected the director to come out and finally promote Bourdon to étoile (star principal). Instead all we all got do was shuffle out quietly and once again go home to wash off what was left of our mascara.

If anyone managed to find the perfect balance between woman and swan this season, it was Bourdon.  Even in the prologue, this princess showed us that she felt that danger prickling down the back of her neck just as an animal does.

As the curtain rises after this interlude, Jeremy-Loup Quer’s Siegfried puts his nightmare aside and is feeling just fine with his friends. He will later prove rather impervious to his mother’s admonitions and more boyishly cheered by her gift of the crossbow. Then, there was the moment where he looked intently at his baby throne only to turn his back on it in order to stare out of once of the the upstage window slits.

This Siegfried’s melancholic solo was infused by a kind of soft urgency, where the stops and starts really expressed a heart and mind unable to figure out which way to go. Touchingly, Bourdon would echo exactly this confused feeling in her solo in the Second Act, bringing to life the idea that Odette is both a product of Siegfried’s imagination and indeed a kindred soul.

As Wolfgang the Tutor, Enzo Saugar had made his entrance like a panther, a strong and dark-eyed presence with threateningly big hands. I instantly remembered his first splash on the stage as a very distinctive young dancer in Neumeier’s Songs of a Wayfarer at the Nureyev gala last year .  Alas, as of now, Saugar continues think those eyes and those splayed fingers suffice. This works at first glance, but goes nowhere in terms of developing a coherent evening-long narrative. He just wasn’t reactive. He was performing for himself.

So thank goodness for Heloïse Bourdon. As Odette, she uses her fingers and wrists mightily as well, but with variety and thought. Hers was a woman and swan in equal and tortured measure. When she encounters Siegfried, he is clearly instantly delighted and she is clearly a woman trapped in a weird body who hestitanly wonders whether he could actually be her saviour.

Whereas Louvet’s Siegfried had seemed to say when the bevy of swans had filled the stage, “What? The world has always been full of swans?! This is like so unbelievable,” Quer seemed to be saying, as with the Princesses later: “Pleasure to meet you, but for me there is only one swan and I’ve already found her.”

 I’d have to agree. Bourdon glowed from within without any fuss, and this was magnified by the unusual way she used her arms. Some dancers don’t connect their arms to their backs, which I hate. When dancers make their arms flow out from their backs this gives their movements that necessary juice. But here Bourdon’s arms had a specific energy that I’ve rarely seen. It flowed and contracted inward in waves from her fingers first and then pulled all the way back into her spine. I was convinced. That’s actually how you do feel and react when you are injured.

Throughout the evening, whether her swan was white or black, these two danced for each other, including not leaving the stage after a solo and staying focused for their partner from a downstage corner.  Whether in Act Two or Four, each time Rothbart tried to rip her out of Siegfried’s arms via his spell, this couple really fought to hold onto each other.  You could understand this prince’s bewilderment at a familiar/unfamiliar catch-me-if you-can Odile. (Perfectly executed, unbelievably chiselled extensions, fouettés, etcetera, blah blah, just promote her already).

Like Giselle, this Odette knew her hold on life was fading as the end of the last act approached. The energy now reversed and seemed to be pumping out from her back through her arms and dripping out of her hands and beyond her control. This Siegfried, like an Albrecht, like someone in a lifeboat, kept begging his beloved to hold fast.

The Paris Opera’s management may be blind, but the audience certainly wasn’t. I saw a lot of red eyes around me as we left the theatre in silence. Oh what the hell. As long as Heloïse Bourdon continues to get at least one chance to dance a leading role per run I can dream, can’t I?  Next time, how about giving her a Giselle for once?

Imagine there’s no heaven
It’s easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us, only sky*

*John Lennon, “Imagine” (1971).

P1220639

Le Lac des cygnes. Héloïse Bourdon (Odette/Odile) et Jeremy-Loup Quer (Siegfried).

1 commentaire

Classé dans Retours de la Grande boutique

Balanchine: au milieu de l’Atlantique

P1180698

Who Cares? Décors Paul Gallis (détail).

Deux parties, deux ambiances. À vol d’oiseau, le trajet entre Saint-Pétersbourg (Ballet impérial) et New York (Who Cares ?) vous fait passer l’entracte quelque part au milieu de l’Atlantique. La première pièce du programme Balanchine, qui est en partie un brouillon des créations postérieures de George, m’a d’abord fait l’effet d’un exercice de style. Le soir de la première, Ludmila Pagliero et Paul Marque semblaient en démonstration pour le Balanchine Trust : « T’as vu ? Je fais tout, même les bizarreries, comme tu m’as dit ! ». C’est à la fois impressionnant de maîtrise, et bien froid. Le lendemain, Héloïse Bourdon et Audric Bezard, techniquement moins à l’aise, racontent une histoire – intrigue de cour et un peu de cœur –, et ce souffle de tension amoureuse fait qu’on cesse de regarder sa montre pour vérifier la différence entre temps objectif et temps ressenti (9 février). Quasiment un mois plus tard, Hannah O’Neill et Marc Moreau, étrennant leur étoile nouvelle, font revenir la pièce sur le versant formel. Las, à un moment, le cavalier fait tourner sa cavalière de manière un peu trop penchée, et  par la suite, sa tension devient douloureusement visible. Souhaitons que l’étoilat permette à damoiseau Moreau de dompter le stress (4 mars).

Dans Who Cares ?, il m’a fallu attendre la deuxième représentation pour voir le style qui manquait à la première, du côté des filles : Charline Giezendanner, dans Do Do Do, a le déhanché et le roulement d’épaule jazzy. C’est discret, chic et charmant. Non contente d’entraîner Gregory Dominiak dans son sillage, elle donne in fine l’impression, par des retirés musicalement impérieux, de donner elle-même le tempo à l’orchestre. C’est grisant (soirées des 9 février et 4 mars). Il faudrait plusieurs Charline pour donner du peps aux évolutions du corps de ballet féminin. Il y a aussi Dorothée Gilbert, flirteuse en chef dans The Man I Love : la ballerine a le déhanché balanchinien voluptueux, mais sans ostentation : cet art d’être le style sans le montrer est délicieux (9 février). On retrouvera la même impression, en moins canaille, chez Ludmila Pagliero (4 mars).

Côté garçons, Germain Louvet donne l’impression d’être une projection des fantasmes des trois filles avec lesquelles il danse : c’est l’homme idéal, celui qui n’existe que dans tes rêves, mon chou (8 février). Jeremy-Loup Quer (9 février) comme Mathieu Ganio (4 mars), ont une présence plus réelle. On s’amuse à voir dans les trois filles qu’ils courtisent autant de new-yorkaises : pour Quer, l’amoureuse (Mlle Gilbert), l’impétrante (Roxane Stojanov, Embraceable You), la pétulante (Bianca Scudamore, Who Cares ?). Pour Ganio, celle qui fait ses premiers pas dans le monde (Mlle Pagliero), l’intello qu’on croise au Metropolitan Museum (Laura Hecquet), et la libérée, celle qui virevolte dans Central Park (Hannah O’Neill).

Commentaires fermés sur Balanchine: au milieu de l’Atlantique

Classé dans Retours de la Grande boutique

“Some enchanted evening/you may see …” (My spring season at the Paris Opera)

Just who wouldn’t want to be wandering about dressed in fluffy chiffon and suddenly encounter a gorgeous man in a forest glade under the moonlight? Um, today, that seems creepy. But not in the 19th century, when you would certainly meet a gentleman on one enchanted evening…« Who can explain it, who can tell you why? Fools give you reasons, wise men never try. »

Notes about the classics that were scheduled for this spring and summer season — La Bayadère, Midsummer Night’s Dream, Giselle — on call from April through July.

*

 *                                     *

P1180305

After the confinement, filmed rehearsals, and then two live runs in succession, DOES ANYONE STILL WANT TO HEAR ABOUT LA BAYADERE? But maybe you are still Dreaming or Giselling, too?

Here are my notes.

Bayaderes

« Some enchanted evening, you may see a stranger across a crowded room. And somehow you know, you know even then, That somehow you’ll see her again and again. »

April 21

In La Bayadère, if Ould-Braham’s Nikiya was as soft and naïve and childlike as Giselle. Bleuenn Batistoni’s  Gamzatti proved as hard and sleek as a modern-day Bathilde: an oligarch’s brat. [Albeit most of those kinds of women do not lift up their core and fill out the music]. Their interactions were as clear and bright and graphic as in a silent movie (in the good sense).

OB’s mind is racing from the start, telling a story to herself and us, desperate to know how this chapter ends. Partnering with the ardent Francesco Mura was so effortless, so “there in the zone.” He’s one of those who can speak even when his back is turned to you and live when he is off to the side, out of the spotlight. Mura is aflame and in character all the time.

OB snake scene, iridescent, relives their story from a deep place  plays with the music and fills out the slow tempi. Only has eyes for Mura and keeps reaching, reaching, her arms outlining the shape of their dances at the temple (just like Giselle. She’s not Nikiya but a  Gikiya).

Indeed, Batistoni’s turn at Gamzatti in the second act became an even tougher bitch with a yacht, as cold-blooded as Bathilde can sometimes be:  a Bamzatti. There was no hope left for Ould-Braham and Francesco Mura in this cruel world of rich fat cats, and they both knew it.

April 3

Park  as Nikiya and later as Giselle will channel the same dynamic: sweet girl: finallly infusing some life into her arms in Act 1, then becoming stiff as a board when it gets to the White Act, where she exhibits control but not a drop of the former life of her character. I am a zombie now. Dry, clinical, and never builds up to any fortissimo in the music. A bit too brisk and crisp and efficient a person to incarnate someone once called Nikiya. Could the audience tell it was the same dancer when we got to Act 3?

Good at leaps into her partner’s arms, but then seems to be a dead weight in lifts. When will Park wake up?

Paul Marque broke through a wall this season and finds new freedom in acting through his body. In Act Three: febrile, as “nervosa” as an Italian racecar. Across the acts, he completes a fervent dramatic arc than is anchored in Act 1.

Bourdon’s Gamzatti very contained. The conducting was always too slow for her. Dancing dutifully. Where is her spark?

*

 *                                     *

P1180391

Midsummer Night Dreams

« Some enchanted evening, someone may be laughing, You may hear her laughing across a crowded room. And night after night, as strange as it seems, The sound of her laughter will sing in your dreams. »

June 30

Very baroque-era vivid conducting.

Aurelien Gay as Puck: feather light.

Pagliero’s Titania is clearly a queen, calm and scary. But also a woman, pliant and delightful.

Jeremy Loup-Quer as Oberon has heft and presence. Dances nicely. Smooth, but his solos are kind of like watching class combinations. (Balanchine’s choreography for the role is just that, basically)

First Butterfly Sylvia Saint-Martin displayed no authority and did the steps dutifully.

Paris Opera Ballet School kiddie corps has bounce and go and delicate precision, bravo.

Bezard/Demetrius in a wig worthy of a Trocks parody. Whyyyy? Particularly off-putting in the last act wedding scene. Who would want to marry a guy disguised as Mireille Matthieu?

Bourdon/Hyppolita unmusical fouettés. I miss her warmth and panache. Gone.

Act 2 Divertissement Pas where the couple appears out of nowhere in the “story.” (see plot summary). The way Louvet extends out and gently grasps Ould-Braham’s hand feels as if he wants to hold on to the music. Both pay heed and homage to the courtly aspect of the Mendelssohn score. That delicacy that was prized by audiences after the end of the Ancien Régime can be timeless. Here the ballerina was really an abstract concept: a fully embodied idea, an ideal woman, a bit of perfect porcelain to be gently cupped into warm hands. I like Ould-Braham and Louvet’s new partnership.  They give to each other.

July 12

Laura Hequet as Helena gestures from without not from within, as is now usual the rare times she takes the stage. It’s painful to watch, as if her vision ends in the studio. Does she coach Park?

Those who catch your eye:

Hannah O’Neill as Hermia and Célia Drouy as Hyppolita. The first is radiant, the second  oh so plush! Hope Drouy will not spend her career typecast as Cupid in Don Q.

In the Act II  Divertissment, this time with Heloise Bourdon, Louvet is much less reverential and more into gallant and playful give and take. These two had complimentary energy. Here Louvet was more boyish than gentlemanly. I like how he really responds to his actresses these days.

Here the pas de deux had a 20th century energy: teenagers rather than allegories. Teenagers who just want to keep on dancing all night long.

NB Heloise Bourdon was surprisingly stiff at first, as if she hadn’t wanted to be elected prom queen, then slowly softened her way of moving. But this was never to be the legato unspooling that some dancers have naturally. I was counting along to the steps more than I like to. Bourdon is sometimes too direct in attack and maybe also simply a bit discouraged these days. She’s been  “always the bridesmaid but never the bride” — AKA not promoted to Etoile — for waaay too long now.  A promotion would let her break out and shine as she once used to.

My mind wandered. Why did the brilliant and over-venerated costume designer Karinska assign the same wreath/crown of flowers (specifically Polish in brightness) to both Bottom in Act I and then to the Act II  Female Allegory of Love? In order to cut costs by recycling a headdress ? Some kind of inside joke made for Mr. B? Or was this joke invented by Christian Lacroix?

*

 *                                     *

img_2046

Giselles

« Some enchanted evening, when you find your true love, When you hear her call across a crowded room, Then fly to her side and make her your own, Or all through your life you may dream all alone.. »

 July 6

 Sae Eun Park/Paul Marque

 Sae Eun Park throws all the petals of the daisy already, does not lower the “he loves me” onto her skirt. There goes one of the main elements of the mad scene.

Her authoritative variations get explosions of applause due to obvious technical facility , plus that gentle smile and calm demeanor that are always on display.

What can Paul Marque’s Albrecht do when faced with all this insipid niciness? I’ve been a bad boy? He does try during the mad scene, shows real regret.

Ninon Raux’s Berthe:  gentle and dignified and not disdainful.

Park’s mad scene was admired by those around me at the top of the house. Many neophites. They admired from afar but not one of those I surveyed at the end of Act I said they had cried when her character died. Same thing at the end of the ballet while we reconnected and loitered around on the front steps of the Palais Garnier.  I asked again. No tears. Only admiration. That’s odd.

On the upside, the Paris Opera has a real thing with bourrées (piétinées), Each night, Myrtha and Giselle gave a plethora of what seemed almost like skateboard or surfing slides. They skimmed over a liquid ground with buttery feet whether forward, backward, or to the side. I think a new standard was set.

In her variations, Hannah O’Neill’s Myrtha gave us a will o’ the wisp of lightly churning jétés. She darted about like the elusive light of a firefly. Alas, where I was sitting behind a cornice meant a blocked view of downstage left, so I missed all of this Wili Queen’s acting for the rest of Act II.

Daniel Stokes’s Hilarion was not desperate enough.

Despite the soaring sweep of the cello, I don’t feel the music in Park-Marque’s Giselle-Albrecht’s pas de deux.  Not enough flow. Marque cared, but Park so careful. No abandon. No connection. The outline of precise steps.

July 11

 Alice Renavand/Mathieu Ganio

Act I

Battistoni/Magliono peasant pas: Turns into attitude, curve of the neck, BB swooshes and swirls into her attitudes and hops. As if this all weren’t deliberate or planned but something quite normal. AM’s dance felt earthbound.

Renavand fresh, plush, youthful, beautiful, and effortlessly mastering the technique (i.e. you felt the technique was all there,  but didn’t start to analyse it). I like to think that Carlotta Grisi exhaled this same kind of naturalness.

ACT II

The detail that may have been too much for Renavand’s body to stand five times in a row: instead of quick relevé passes they were breathtakingly high sissones/mini-gargoullades…as if she was trying to dance as hard as Albrecht in order to save him (Mathieu Ganio,, in top form and  manly and protective and smitten from start to stop with his Giselle. Just like all the rest of us)

Roxane Stojanov’s Myrtha? Powerful. Knows when a musical combination has its punch-line, knows how to be still yet attract the eye. She continues to be one to watch.

July 16

 Myriam Ould-Braham/Germain Louvet

Act I :

A gentle and sad and elegant Florent Melac/Hilarion, clearly in utter admiration of the local beauty. Just a nice guy without much of a back story with Giselle but a guy who dreams about what might have been.

Ould-Braham a bit rebellious in her interactions with mum. This strong-minded choice of Albrecht above all will carry into the Second Act. Myrtha will be a kind of hectoring female authority figure. A new kind of mother. So the stage is set.

Peasant pas had the same lightness as the lead couple. As if the village were filled with sprites and fairies.

Peasant pas: finally a guy with a charisma and clean tours en l’air:  who is this guy with the lovely deep plié? Axel Magliano from the 11th!  This just goes to show you, never give up on a dancer. Like all of us, we can have a day when we are either on or off. Only machines produce perfect copies at every performance.

Bluenn Battistoni light and balanced and effortless. She’s not a machine, just lively and fearless. That spark hasn’t been beaten out of her by management. yet.

O-B’s mad scene: she’s angry-sad, not abstracted, not mad. She challenges Albrecht with continued eye contact.

Both their hearts are broken.

Act II:

This Hilarion, Florent Melac, weighs his steps and thoughts to the rhythm of the church bells. Never really listened to a Hilarion’s mind  before.

Valentine Colasante is one powerful woman. And her Myrtha’s impatience with men kind of inspires me.

O-B and Germain Louvet both so very human. O-B’s “tears” mime so limpid and clear.

GL: all he wants is to catch and hold her one more time. And she also yearns to be caught and cherished.  All of their dance is about trying to hold on to their deep connection. This is no zombie Giselle. When the church bells sang the song of dawn, both of their eyes widened in awe and wonder and yearning at the same time. Both of their eyes arms reached out in perfect harmony and together traced the outline of that horizon to the east where the sun began to rise. It was the end, and they clearly both wanted to go back to the beginning of their story.

*

 *                                     *

What would you do, if you could change the past?

« Once you have found her, never let her go. Once you have found her, never let her go. »

The quotations are from the Rogers and Hammerstein Broadway musical called
« South Pacific » from 1949.

2 Commentaires

Classé dans Retours de la Grande boutique