Archives d’Auteur: Fenella

A propos Fenella

Pour ne pas rester muette, car je n'ai pas les deux pieds dans le même sabot, i will write in English.
par | 1 mai 2013 · 8 h 01 min

As Diaghilev may have said: “ASTONISH ME!”

diaghilev CocteauA triple-bill : “Béjart / Nijinski / Robbins / Cherkaoui-Jalet” and the others (Igor, Claude, Maurice) begins May 2nd at the Palais Garnier in Paris.  

Probably the most famous words spoken in dance (and probably the most apocryphal – mà, si no è vero è molto ben trovato), the impresario Serge Diaghilev’s roar quoted above can also be interpreted as “I want the best of everything.”  In 1908, this Russian aesthete began flooding Paris and beyond with the best musicians, the best dancers, the best designers, all obsessed by ceaselessly exploring the now and the new.  Until his death in 1929, Diaghilev’s Ballets Russes company continued this obstinate pursuit of the cutting edge: rich evenings of one-act ballets harnessing season after season the best talents of his time (some of them in embryo, as in a neophyte Coco Chanel for costumes):  Balanchine, Nijinsky and his sister Nijinska, Massine, Lifar/ Picasso, Braque, Matisse, Goncharova/ Stravinsky, Prokofiev, Debussy, Ravel…

Here the Paris Opera Ballet pays tribute in a manner Diaghilev might have endorsed: one revival, two re-mixes, and something so utterly new that the current management hopes it will make you jump out of your seat.

L’OISEAU DE FEU (FIREBIRD

Choreography:  Maurice Béjart (1970)

Music:  Igor Stravinsky (1910)

The original choreography for this ballet as set by Michel Fokine in 1910 continues to be produced in companies around the world.  Inspired by Russian fairytales, the classic version tells a linear story:  a rather dim prince encounters a big red bird wearing a tutu and toe shoes.  To the prince’s astonishment this one, unlike most ballet heroines, is not hanging around waiting to be loved or rescued, she wants to be rid of him.  She buys her freedom with a feather that will bring her back if called, promising to help him if need be.  And he will need it, once he encounters an evil sorcerer who seems to patronize the same beauty parlor as Edward Scissorhands.  In the end, the prince will end up freeing a passel of knights who had been uncomfortably turned into stone and a multitude of enchanted princesses for them to marry.

Maurice Béjart kept the redness of the “firebird’s” costume, but little else of the story when he remade it.  Or did he?  For the essence of the story remains the same:  we yearn for freedom, for liberation, at any price.

Here the bird –the free spirit, the catalyst — is danced by a man. For Béjart, totally ‘60’s in his instincts, a “firebird” could only mean a “phoenix:” a creature willing to be consumed and destroyed if that brings us a greater good.  Unlike the bird of 1910, this one will try to fire up the masses, rather than simply shake up a spoiled and naive princeling.

Honestly, I find the 1910 version, rooted in ancient Russian myth, eternally satisfying in the way it responds to and is rooted in the music. This 1970’s “partisan” version – inspired by emotions burning deeply right then due to the Vietnam War – can seem somewhat dated.  On the other hand, while it remains rather easy to locate women sporting tutus and feathers, being able to gape at a buff guy dancing his head off in tight vintage red spandex remains a relatively rare, and a most pleasant, experience.

 L’APRES-MIDI D’UN FAUNE (AFTERNOON OF A FAUN)

Choreography:  Vaslav Nijinsky (1912)

Music: Claude Debussy

Ode to a Grecian Urn goes somewhat 3-D.  Dance stiff and stylized in profile with bent knees and legs in parallel (as unnatural and uncomfortable for ballet dancers as skiing).

In this re-creation of the original choreography, a half-man/half-animal meets some females with anacreontic hair.  Not quite sure what to do with his feelings and the signals these women seem to send, the Faun ends up frightening them away. Like men in most bars today, he just doesn’t get it.

Left alone to figure out just what to do with the scarf one of the nymphs dropped when she fled, the Faun’s final gesture will still, 101 years later, astonish – even offend — some in the audience.

L’APRES-MIDI D’UN FAUNE (AFTERNOON OF A FAUN)

Choreography:  Jerome Robbins (1953)

Music: Claude Debussy

The same music again, but completely different…or maybe not. Consider how a ballet dancer his/her self could seem to be the most exotic and mysterious figure out there for many of us flat-footed ones.  They are fauns, fauna.  Outside the studio, they glide yet walk like ducks, hold their heads as if they had antlers balanced atop, take dragonfly leaps over puddles in a delicate manner frogs would envy, do weird catlike stretches in airplanes…but inside the studio, freed from our gaze, they become human again.

Jerome Robbins (choreographer of Gypsy, West Side Story, Dances at a Gathering) created a ménage-a-trois to the same score as Nijnsky:  only here the almost lovers turn out to be 1) a boy 2) a girl 3) the studio mirror.  We, the audience, get to play the “mirror.”   If the 1910 version made you gasp, think about how here you get seduced into becoming peeping toms.

BOLERO

Choreography: Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui/Damien Jalet( 2013)

Sets (and probably explosive ideas): Marina Abramovic

Music: Maurice Ravel (1928)

Invented in 18th century Spain, the “bolero” is a slow dance where two simple melodies are repeated again and again over a stuttering triple rhythm (one, a-a-a, and three, and one…). The Franco-Basque composer Maurice Ravel’s version differs from its model in that it builds to a cathartic orchestral crescendo.  Think Andalucia meets Phillip Glass.

In a medium difficult to write down and for long rarely deemed worth filming, Bronislava Nijinska’s original choreography – for the pickup company of a former Diaghilev diva who dared to set up a rival company, Ida Rubinstein — died with those who had experienced its few performances in 1928. Apparently her creation didn’t astonish the audience enough.

In Maurice Béjart’s 1961 version – the one most performed since — he appropriated part of Nijinska’s original story: a man/woman dancing alone on a table in a tavern.  But Béjart added how he/she slowly arouses his/her spectators on-stage and out-front to a rather melodic orgasm. His version remains enormously popular, if always rather embarrassing to witness.

As the première of a new conceptualization of this same music will take place May 2nd, I cannot tell you more than the pedigrees of the three commissioned to astonish us:

Cherkaoui/Jalet, both born in 1976, have collaborated for years on performance pieces, all over the world.  Cherkaoui started dance late – but is a very hip grasshopper — Jalet started his drama and ethnographic music studies earlier.  Both grew into and from the wild Belgian modern dance scene, which continues to sprout all over. Both men love exploring the limits of music and dance and stagecraft: from Björk to flamenco, from Florence and the Machine to Shaolin monks, from the potential physically and mentally disabled performers can bring to life to the banality of our everyday gestures.  These two share a quest to explore and explode categories of identity.

Adjoining them to the Grande Dame of Terrifying Performance Art – Marina Abramovic – makes me a bit nervous. Dare I say she explores and explodes too much in protest against our flat lives? Even if her most recent piece, which played at the MOMA in New York, seemed mild (only sharing a moment of silence per person during 736 hours with hordes who lined up for the emotionally exhausting experience), she has built a reputation since the 1970’s as someone inspired by quite extreme quests: almost burning to death, passing out from lack of oxygen, taking pills in order to have seizures or catatonia in front of an audience, letting it bleed…

Because they have pushed their bodies to the limit since childhood, self-induced pain brings nothing exciting and new to dancers. All that I hope is that this creative trio agrees that their cast has already been tortured enough. On the other hand, since I couldn’t attend the last time a ballet provoked a riot by furious spectators – the Diaghilev-provoked Rite of Spring one hundred years ago – I’d be tickled to actually be present at one…

Commentaires fermés

Classé dans Hier pour aujourd'hui, Humeurs d'abonnés, Retours de la Grande boutique

Tagué , , , , , , , , , , , ,

par | 29 mars 2013 · 22 h 41 min

Roland Petit bill : “Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee”

P1010032While the big news of the evening of March 27th, has of course become Eleonora Abbagnato’s late-career elevation to the rank of étoile/prima ballerina during the final curtain calls, I’d like to start by mentioning other dancers, those young talents and strong soloists who gave masterful performances earlier in this evening devoted to Roland Petit’s ballets.

Dancers, athletes, choreographers.  The self-proclaimed greatest boxer Muhamed Ali once said “Champions aren’t made in the gyms.  Champions are made from something they have deep inside of them: a desire, a dream, a vision.”

Many criticize Petit as merely a “dance maker.” Or even worse, a vulgarian. However I like the fact that, by being somewhat obvious at times, his desire, his dream, his vision, was to make the audience feel smart and included. His are ballets to be engaged with directly, without afterwards feeling forced  — because you feel stupid and confused — to purchase and read an expensive program with all its extensive rhetorical flourishes.  What his works will always need – and don’t all ballets? – is to continue to be fed by the imaginations of great dancers, younger and older. They can give any package of steps and gestures new life and, by melting into the music, provide the “oomph” that make ballet continue to come alive again night after night.

“It’s a lack of faith that makes people afraid of meeting challenges, and I believe in myself.” (M.Ali)

Le Rendez-vous distills, somewhat awkwardly, the perfume of post-liberation Paris.  That somehow magical moment of Juliette Greco, of Sartre, of Montand and smoke-filled dance halls. While “of the moment” in 1945, it’s now up to the performers to make this dusty relic sing to us.

Alexandre Gasse, a youthful demi-soloist, got his chance to embody the archetypical “young man about to be eaten alive during sex by a praying mantis” (Petit’s ballets can unfortunately, I must admit, too often resort to the virgin/whore and man vs. female bloodsucker dichotomy pushed to center stage during the Romantic Era but which wears thin these days).

Most of the ballet actually revolves around his gentle relationship with a crippled beggar – to set up that he’s a nice guy — only in the last scene does he have to deal with the femme fatale in high heels (crippling for her).  Throughout, Gasse floated like a butterfly, landing after all kinds of double-tours softly onto one knee.  His performance was free, emotionally fresh, danced with flair and thoughtfullness, his chest and back open and ready to take on almost any challenge.

I’d begun to hope that he’d just go off with the beggar and, as they say in the  French variation on “happily ever after:  “et ils eurent beaucoup d’enfants.” But then another young soloist arrived for her date with the audience, Amandine Albisson.

Albisson, in her Louise Brooks wig, at first made me think of Arielle Dombasle during her recent Crazy Horse phase.  But she only resembled a frozen monument to pulchritude at first glance.   Albisson has already demonstrated – in Psyché or in In the Middle, for example –  that she is endowed with a fearless stage persona and spotlight-attracting cool. Even if she hasn’t yet quite mastered the scarily humorous and sensual way that Ciaravola and Cyd Charisse unfurl their gams in extensions, her dance already has its own weight and authority.  For two seasons now, she’s been testing her wings.  I hope she won’t try to imitate Ciaravola or Guillem  and continues to believe in herself.

“George can’t hit was his hands cant see/Now you see me, now you don’t/George thinks he will, but I know he won’t.” [M. Ali]

Le Loup is a cruel parable of mistaken identities and identity confusion.  Sabrina Mallem, in the supporting role of the gypsy, grasped the chance to have the time of her life: she created a character ferocious and cruel by using sharply stabbing feet,  no, chiseled, no, it wasn’t about the feet, the legs, the arms, at all in fact.  It was about the full-bodied, blood-rich, completely disarming sensuality she managed to express at every swerve of every part of her superbly-controlled body.  Mallem radiated life like a great boxer high on adrenaline. She’s hit that “sweet spot” where honed technique and learned stagecraft make even a mere soloist a great performer.

And so to Carmen, a highlight during an evening of highlights.  Where Abbagnato seemed to be telling us and them:

“If you ever dream of beating me…you better wake up and apologize.” [yes, Ali again]

Petit structured a couture gown around his beloved Zizi Jeanmaire with this ballet, designed to highlight all of her multiple attributes… in 1949. And ever since, the specter of its two creators has haunted each ballerina who dares try to tame this ballet while trapped in yet another black wig.

Most fall into two categories: those Carmens who overdo the bent-index-finger biting “ergo me sexy” category, and the others who overdo the “ I gotta pretend I be ze flamenco queen “ category.  In each case, they all forget that the original French text, even music, is filled with bitter irony and a raised eyebrow.

Petit’s Carmen does not need to be overcooked.  She needs to hum, not scream.   She’s the only fully human character in the whole piece.  The rest certainly move about, but they – especially the men — are in essence cardboard cutouts.

Abbagnato’s Carmen fluttered like a butterfly and brawled like a bee. She sandpapered away all the clear edges one would expect, and spared us any “olé, olé” hispanitude. More than that, she gave a dragonfly aspect to the character.  Never at rest, always buzzing, ever alert to threat, proud of her delicately nervy wings.  Indeed, she was probably unphotographable this night, for she rarely paused to pose for a six o’clock standard snapshot. She was too busy dancing.  And by really dancing, not just steps but ideas, she kept making the interstices in between the usual photo-ops come alive.

I found myself completely absorbed by the final duel between this elusive heroine and her Don José: for once it seemed as if this Carmen suddenly had decided that there was no way the choreographer would let her down and not let her go free. Her movement reflected less the shivering angry  pride of Zizi Jeanmaire when confronted by Don José’s knife, but a kind of shock  at this man’s betrayal. By wielding a knife, he was cheating and breaking the rules of the game. Dragonflies, butterflies, bees never expect to face a pesticide.

So when Abbagnato launched herself at her lover’s knife with the fervor of the character she’d sculpted in 40 minutes flat… the entire house heard another patron near me “lose it.”  A loud gasp of “Mais ça alors!” [American translation: “Jesus H. Christ.”]  That’s the kind of comment yelled out at a boxing match where the one you root for gets hammered.

While some of you may find Petit awfully corny, I like the fact that he always tried to make the dances where dancers could convince even one member of the audience thinks this dream, this vision….is real.  And never want to wake up.

Commentaires fermés

Classé dans Retours de la Grande boutique

Tagué , , , , , , , ,

par | 9 mars 2013 · 9 h 19 min

The Nureyev “Gala” in Paris: I was there, but Nureyev definitely wasn’t.

P1010033What a stunningly lukewarm tribute to a glorious past. If, quite often, some piece turned out to be cleverly — even beautifully — danced, what the evening consistently denied the audience was a sense of how Nureyev had touched the lives of the dancers in this company.

The evening began with a 4-minute slide-show of photos set to Swan Lake’s polonaise. And then, as they say in Italy, è basta. No films of rehearsals, no other reminders during the evening, no tributes at the end, no nothing.

Craning my neck around from my seat even before the evening started, I had been delighted to spot many who once served to inspire Nureyev’s obsessively revisited stagings of remembered worlds of choreography during his tenure in Paris. All of these retired but far-from-dead dancers continue to speak eloquently and openly at other venues about how Nureyev’s passion for dancing inspired their own. Yet not a single one had been drafted to pass along to us this night what they knew of Nureyev, to say a few words, (even on video) before each piece. How I wish that at least they had all been invited onstage at the very end to take a group révérence.

Nureyev’s inventiveness as a choreographer remained equally unacknowledged due to the choice of excerpts.

Why present so many warhorse standards that only shed dim light on what Nureyev had once wrought? We just went through 24 “Don Quichotte’s” two months ago: so did we really have to revisit the entire pas de deux which is the least “Nureyev-y” part of the production, to then only be offered a taste — the entrada and adagio — of the Black Swan pas de deux which he’d idiosyncratically expanded into a pas de trois with that unusual solo for Rothbart/himself?

After Raymonda’s “clapping variation” my mind drifted to how many dancers in the audience had been directly involved in the enormous adventure of “Raymonda.” Nureyev had filled out the life of this ballet by bringing each character to the fore. He transformed the small mime-y roles of Henriette and Clémence, of Bernard and Béranger, into fully and deftly danced ones. Where was the pas de six? Where was the great big waltz for a full corps of boys and girls? And where did they hide that beautiful and exotic and manly creation, Abderahm, with his – for its time — devastating synthesis of classic and modern impulses?

Most of all, I wondered what had happened to the male corps de ballet which Nureyev was purported to have re-energized? It must have been dancing outside the house during those first four minutes of slides when the orchestra had attacked the polonaise and then gone home. Our one moment with more than a four men at a time — Don Q’s fandango — while certainly inventive and stylish, doesn’t really bring any of the technical and expressive abilities of the male corps to the forefront.

An “homage” to Nureyev where men hardly dance at all? Is that possible? In peevish response, I will not mention a single ballerina in this summary.

Almost all of the leading men got stuck being wallpaper. We caught glimpses of: Hervé Moreau, Benjamin Pech, Mathieu Ganio, Stéphane Phavorin, Audric Bézard, Vincent Chaillet, Yann Saiz : all relegated to supporting females  in pirouettes or penchées, The men got to do their moves as if the pre-Nureyev, no, the pre–Nijinsky ukaze against male dancers daring to be other than moving-men was still in force. As in: we do our best, but nobody wants to look at us anyway.

Duquenne tried, stretching out the energy of his arabesques as Nureyev would have liked in the Nutcracker Snow Scene. Magnenet brought energy and delight to “Cendrillon.” Le Riche shrugged off this atmosphere  and charmed his way into Juliet’s heart during the balcony scene from "Roméo". Each time: a female partner. What about Nureyev’s  many duets and trios for guys?

The only masculine solo saved the evening for me. Nureyev would have relished the way Matthias Heymann returned to the stage after a major injury. Nureyev had always loved beautiful movement full-out, had loved honesty in the moment, had used his eye to pick out those dancers who come fully alive on stage, who need and want to have us out there in the dark. Heymann’s ecstatic resurrection as Byron’s/Nureyev’s ill-begotten “Manfred” provided a rare moment of grace.  Perhaps the only true homage all night.

The evening ended with bits of the last act of “La Bayadère,” including the languorous descent of 32 ballerinas, lovely, albeit no longer an unusual feat for most companies. Why not the devilishly complex fugue for the boys and girls from the first act of his “Swan Lake?” Or the many other moments from Nureyev’s “Bayadère” when male dancers do take part? Or, or… (As Solor, Stéphane Bullion mostly provided wallpaper too).

Perhaps that is why none of Nureyev’s dancers took to the stage at the end of the evening. This provincial gala had had nothing to do with what Nureyev had taught them – and us – about ballet.

Un commentaire

Classé dans Humeurs d'abonnés, Retours de la Grande boutique

Tagué , , , , , ,

par | 16 février 2013 · 8 h 29 min

KAGUYAHIME: three faces of the moon (and the sun)

AgnèsKagyahimeAlice Renavand and Hervé Moreau:

 “There came a wind like a bugle;/It quivered through the grass […] How much can come/And much can go/And yet abide the world!” [Emily Dickinson,“There came a wind”]

Ah, what an innocent moon princess, wide-eyed little mermaid, who gave us dance that proved as soothing as a warm bowl of milk.  Renavand’s Kaguyahime on February 7 linked her every movement into the next into the next and the next with the smoothest control and ease.

Her baby-goddess made me think of…a kitten, a filly, a puppy.  One who went out to play, got fascinated by a bit of string, trotted after a butterfly – the entire audience returned her grin when she got hoisted onto those boxes by the villagers – and then found herself lost and too far away from home, naïvely incapable of understanding why a pack of surly hounds started picking on her.

Her encounter with Hervé Moreau’s Mikado [Emperor] really proved the highlight of the evening.  Just looking at him — utterly still but overly alert on his throne then slicing sinuously through those theatrically billowing golden waves of fabric — I could have sworn I heard the supple baritone gravitas of the actor Jeremy Irons’s voice.  Renavand’s juvenile moonkitten found herself face to face with a fully-grown lion.  None of the other Mikados made me so feel the burden of great power and its constraints:  his spine seemed endlessly strong, elongated, yet a stillness in his core indicated that maintaining dignity at all costs took precedence over any hope for true love. When rejected at the end, he didn’t flicker an eyelash. He re-stretched his spine and then, with the grace befitting a son of the Sun, prowled in slow-motion down into the drummers pit with such with silken elegance that none of us could take our eyes off of him.

Agnès Letestu and Vincent Chaillet:

“Our journey had advanced;/ Our feet were almost come/To that odd fork in Being’s road, /Eternity by term.” [Emily Dickinson, “Our journey had advanced”]

When I first got to Paris, some of my random seatmates could grumble about Letestu. Gorgeous, yes, but so self-contained. One of the few nominated as étoile after Nureyev had stuffed that level with spectacular personalities (leaving  most of the next generation to vegetate as “premières danseuses”) she must have felt enormous pressure.  Too many of her interpretations were “in the head” – Giselle’s completely internalized mad scene as inspired by Dustin Hoffmann in “Rainman” springs to mind – but I always thought that if she’s that smart and that conscientious and that potentially delicious, then if one day she lets go of all that and just lets herself be onstage, it will happen. That has now been the case for these last glorious years. Think of the way she sunk her teeth into “Diamonds” by letting herself enjoy the mastery of movement and space she had always possessed, utterly stunning Jean-Guillaume Bart. Remember her magnificently gleeful and relaxed Siren recently in “The Prodigal Son.”

Is that why I found the moon on February 8 closest to being an absolute goddess, the live embodiment of a star.  Such women, like the self-contained Garbo, paid dearly for the freedom to just be themselves.  Letestu has let go of all the tiny voices and knives around her, but perhaps used the memory of all that to shape her poignant persona in this role. Her Kaguyahime also resembles Kylían himself: a deeply melancholy and intelligent man, quite disabused about life and others, yet generous, thoughtful, and full of a desire to connect with the audience.  Like Kylian, and the gods, Letestu held out a hand to us from the moment she stepped onto that platform and began to perform her first measured and tentative steps.  She radiated trust in herself…and trust in our capacity to follow her on her journey.

Vincent Chaillet’s manly Mikado could not hope to hold onto such a philosopher-queen. He was (quite!) appealing, but this incarnation of the moon recognized the power of her own innate sadness.  She made us feel that she had always known that daylight would be too bright for her to endure for long.

Renavand’s final steps homewards made me sad for the adventure she felt forced to abandon. She had no choice.  Letestu’s made me glad: all evening, she had made each of her choices with integrity and lucid honesty. And she had said all she wanted to say. When Gillot finally turned her back on us, the feeling became bittersweet.

Marie-Agnès Gillot with Alexis Renaud:

“Parting is all we know of heaven, / And all we need of hell.” [Emily Dickinson, “Parting”]  

Her interpretation benefitted most from the change of venue to the more cozy and intimate venue of the Palais Garnier.

She’s a complicated dancer.  Ballet is crueler than the modeling world and, as a woman of height, thin but with the gorgeous shoulder-blades of a swimmer, I am certain she’s had this fact drilled into her:  you can be cast as a queen (Swan or Wili) but abandon hope for ingénue or princess.  When in fact she’s allowed to play soft and feminine roles, she can astonish us:  her first act Paquita on one night about ten years ago should have served as the model to others of how to dance fleet of foot and light of heart.  Her petit allegro made you forget that it’s quite hard for big dancers to move fast.  She made herself weightless.

Back at the Bastille, Gillot’s performance of Kaguyahime two years ago suffered from a need to project into that big barn of a house. This brought out a necessarily ingrained discomfort about being “too big.”  So her interpretation back then struck me as a bit marmoreal, monumental, too dour.  She put none of the finesse and delicacy that she possesses to use.

When she appeared on stage on February 14th, my eye (from the top of the Garnier) found itself drawn to…her hands, suddenly tapered and filled with a febrile energy that seemed to shine out from the tips of her fingers.  (I hadn’t seen that from much closer two years ago).  These little/big hands began to tell a story:  “at home, I have the loooongest fingers, but here I stretch and stretch and they still feel so stubby. What’s going on?”  This alien from the moon vividly expressed disconnect:  her movements constantly exhibited darting moments of tension, as if she kept wanting to find the way back to moving the way she used to when she had been happy and free up in the sky.  Of all our three moons, she most illustrated how walking on earth — being bound by gravity, assaulted by our filthy and exhausting air — challenged her.  Not at all that she couldn’t do the steps or looked like a big lump – the “floor-barre” solo in Act II left no doubt as to each ballerina’s masterful, even superhuman, muscular control – but even near the end she continued exploring how to shape each movement against the tethers of the earth and that engaged my sympathy.

Pairing her with Alexis Renaud’s Emperor – diffident, less assertive than the others – inverted the dynamic of Renavand/Moreau.  Renaud needed the aid of those two henchmen to subdue her, and he knew it.  But by being softer, he allowed Gillot to become the only one of our moons to really hesitate about returning to the sky.  Each time she turned back towards us at the end, you could feel her dilemma:  “maybe I’m wrong, maybe happiness really does exist in your world?”

Commentaires fermés

Classé dans Retours de la Grande boutique

Tagué , , , , , , ,

par | 8 février 2013 · 18 h 43 min

Small steps/Onegin in London, bis.

P1000939When little kids think about dancing, they imagine either prancing around or doing that tippy-toe tiny run which Americans call a “bourrée” and the French call “piétinées” (literally = little stabbing steps you use to crush something.)  Tipping around on your toes while not shuddering your entire body ain’t, to put it lightly, easy. Dancers with boobs hate this step. Even without boobs, you feel the largest you’ve ever been doing this most simple little thing. It’s just not natural and the mirror concurs: you’ve never looked more tense and gelatinous in your entire life. It’s the simplest, but the most damnably difficult series of small steps on earth.

When Alina Cojocaru, as Tatiana, began to bourrée around the stage, one hand hung limply about mid-chest, disconnected from the rest of the buttery palpitations of her feet. Limp at first, yet her hand vibrated in and out due to the aftershocks of the troubling feet below.  I finally understood the point of this step. It’s not about prancing. It’s the means by which you can semaphore just how hard your own heart is beating. Most often when you get to do it on stage (Swan Lake comes to mind) the bourrée means to tell the audience you hesitate about something, most often love.  Cojocaru’s thoughtlessly palpitating little hand kept bumping against her heart.

Having seen her many times, including her Paris Giselle, I still could not tell you about the shape of her arch.  The Olympic rating of her feet [probably gorgeous] is not the point.  The way she uses her feet is.

Shattered by Onegin’s [Jason Reilly’s] rejection in Act II, Cojocaru then focused me on her neck and eyes.  The way she seemed to nestle hesitantly yet trustingly into Bennet Garside/Gremin’s ardent but prudent arms and return his gentle gaze let the audience know that there might be an interesting Act III to come.  Too often, I’ve found that I’ve forgotten that the leftover guy who dances around with her from Act II is the same dancer who becomes her husband in Act III.  The Gremins need to somehow come alive just at the moment that their Tatianas endure public humiliation…this role tends to be undercooked.   Here it came out just right.

In the evening, Thomas Whitehead’s Gremin proved a most White Russian aristocrat.  I’ve often been perplexed by how that role should be played.  Here you are, covered in medals, a prize coveted by matchmakers, yet the girl of your dreams has somehow managed to fall publicly and stupidly in love with someone else much less worthy.  But you can’t play for boorish aristocrat, for then Tatiana must be really crazy not do do an Anna Karenina.  This supporting role demands delicate balance.  Tenderness or masculine pride seem to offer themselves as the best options.  Gartside opted for tender, Whitehead went for pride.

And that worked in each case. They were up against very different women, Cojocaru’s Tatiana couldn’t stand the suspense and looked at the last page of the book she was reading in order to calm down, while Sarah Lamb’s Tatiana let her book happen to her.  Her bourrées were cleaner, more literal. She wasn’t a sprite who needed to be tamed, she was already a woman, as Cleopold has pointed out.  But a woman, as she tippy-toed around aroused by love her hands dangling poised and softly curled, who had already lost her way and probably would never find the strength to go after what she was looking for.

Purists – White Russians raised on Pushkin, other picky eaters – would have died during this evening performance.  OK, so Lamb is as blonde as they come, and so what?  As if Tchaikovsky’s opera hadn’t already added to and cut all kinds of stuff from the original poem.  Why fault this ballet for not cleaving to the (which one?) original?  Ballet was never meant to illustrate but to create new images…

Instead of wearing a ridiculous wig, Lamb concentrated on creating a rich character out of flesh and bone.  This one never will get over the romance novels that her dashing Onegin (Valeri Hristov) deems so jejune. That is why her piétinées/bourrés seemed smoother, more widely spaced, more confident.  She knew that she had found her romantic hero and would never change her mind.  Precisely because she was so touchingly naïve and confident in her Act 1 Dream Scene, remaining somehow so while shocked by Lensky’s murder, Lamb’s final act proved heartbreaking. In a very different way.  Cojocaru’s Tatiana let us know that the tragedy from here on after would be Onegin’s and she had already begun to grieve for him.  By first dancing calmly and kindly – Englishly? – with her boring husband, then suddenly re-awakened to sensuality – and, oh, the possibilities — with Onegin, Lamb let us know that losing him will become the obsession that will shape of the rest of her bitterly unhappy life.  Cojocaru’s Tatiana will find joy in other things, be they babies or sunsets or sitting by the fireplace.  Nothing in the rest of Sarah Lamb’s Tatiana’s life will ever satisfy her.

One day, Cojocaru’s T. will tell her husband the whole story (Gartside makes you feel she probably already has).  Lamb’s T. will take this secret with her to the grave, for it’s all she has, the only thing in her life that ever had meaning.

The bourrée is a weird step, for you can either move forwards, backwards, sideways, or remain stuck in the same place.  Few other steps can express all the possible responses you could take to all of life’s choices.  It’s up to you how you dance it.

Ce diaporama nécessite JavaScript.

Commentaires fermés

Classé dans Blog-trotters (Ailleurs), Ici Londres!

Tagué , , , , , , ,

par | 31 janvier 2013 · 17 h 20 min

An unbiased plot summary of KAGUYAHIME

“Fair as the moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners.” (The Song of Solomon)

Kaguyahime, NDTI 1991, Photo Roger-Viollet

Kaguyahime, NDTI 1991, Photo Roger-Viollet

The word “surreal” nestles between “surprise” and “surrender” in most dictionaries.

1) “Having the intense irrational reality of a dream;”

2) “to strike with wonder or amazement esp. because unexpected (as noun)/ an attack made without warning (verb);”

3) “the action of yielding one’s person…into the power of another” (Websters’s Dictionary)

 All prove unexpectedly useful when trying to think about what happened in, and your reactions to, this most unusual and practically indescribable ballet.

Maki Ishii’s score gives us the live collaboration of Western percussionists with Japanese experts of Kodo and Gagaku. Jirí Kylián, inspired by the music, uses one of the first recorded stories in Japanese literature, The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter, to frame the action on stage.  Yet there is nothing “Japanese-y” about the staging, the choreography, the over-all message. This piece embodies a universal lament:  since the beginning of time men continue to blame women for arousing their own testosterone-driven impulses to commit violence.

ACT I  [40 minutes]

She, Kaguyahime the goddess of the moon, slowly prepares to descend to earth.  There she intends to walk carefully through its bamboo forests. Some part of her hesitates to encounter the earth’s fearsome aliens: us humans, but curiosity consumes her. She tests the ground with her feet gently – for her as weird a sensation as walking on the moon for us.

The music will illustrate this contrast between the celestial and the earthy throughout. The hypnotic rustle of the Gagaku winds, made of bamboo, belong to Kaguyahime’s world.  Harmonious and refined, Gagaku has provided the exquisite soundtrack to imperial court ceremonies for over a thousand years.  Buoyant and vigorous, Kodo drums are the sound of village festivities, they celebrate us in all our primal human power. Indeed, this is one piece where you may be excused for leaning forward to look into the orchestra pit:  the magnificent drummers seem to be dancing themselves.

Men in white, the “suitors” from the village, steal in and push around boxes (the symbolism escapes me). Each vies for her attention by dancing a solo of increasing intensity. Soon it becomes clear that they all wish to seduce her.  The last one actually manages to touch her, but cannot hold on to her. She manages to keep eluding his grasp.

The ground cleaves open to create a living sea of red colors.  The women of this village take over the stage and dance in a wild and jumpy way, pulling the men back into their orbit. Boxes are pushed around, opened and shut (the symbolism escapes me).  Kaguyahime finds herself literally hoisted onto a pedestal. But do they wish to celebrate or isolate her?

When conflict begins, we should not be surprised.  Those in black are the Mikado’s (Emperor’s) minions  — call them knights or nobles or…just…more… men.  This is not class struggle, however, for they fight about only one thing:  a woman.

The goddess of the moon is bewildered and sad. Why such a mess?  How could this be her fault?

O! Withered is the garland of the war,/The soldier’s pole is fallen; young boys and girls/Are level now with men; the odds is gone,/And there is nothing left remarkable/Beneath the visiting moon.” [Shakespeare, Antony and Cleopatra, Act IV]

Intermission [20 minutes]

ACT II  [30 minutes]

            Very violent drumming. One musician almost bashes in the face of a drum shaped like “the man on the moon.” The noise could even remind you of helicopters, the sound associated with combat. A local dispute has escalated into a major war where even women join the battle. Trapped by the competitive violence her beauty has evoked, Kaguyahime – as hapless as Helen of Troy – lets herself be pulled to and fro by a boy, a couple…

The gentle moon goddess tries to cover her ears, to hide, increasingly fearful of what she has wrought merely by having shown her shimmering self to us.

The stage is invaded by a billowing golden curtain. Our goddess finds herself engulfed in the manipulative and more than intoxicating embrace of the Emperor.  At first he seems quite the boor, stomping in with his two henchmen, but something about him fascinates her. She gets pushed and pulled in a tortured quartet and then abruptly finds herself alone. Perhaps, her solo suggests, the emperor – of all these men – has touched her heart? Could he possibly be more than a mere man? Perhaps slightly divine?

More wild drumming than you could ever imagine.  The army returns. The moon goddess suffers being beset by shields, mirrors, blocks: has the Emperor arranged all this new confusion?  He wants her.  And she does to, as becomes clear in a tense and too short duet. (I lament how little stage-time Kylián allots the Emperor).

But this proves a most intelligent goddess.  Frightened by the awful covetousness of humans, their endless capacity for jealousy and their easy willingness to kill each other over all unimportant things, Kaguyahime decides to leave this planet.

She summons the brightest light. After the Emperor leaves her be –  descending as calmly as a sunset — she ascends regretfully back to her home in the sky, so very sorry that we have all disappointed her dreams of life amongst us.

With how sad Steps, O Moon, thou climb’st the skies!/ How silently, and with how wan a face!/ What! May it be that even in heavenly place/ That busy archer his sharp arrows tries? [Sir Philip Sidney, “Astrophel and Stella.”]

6 Commentaires

Classé dans Hier pour aujourd'hui

Tagué , , ,

par | 14 décembre 2012 · 7 h 30 min

When flights of angels sing. Forsythe and Brown for the Paris Opera Ballet.

photo (1)Tuesday, December 11

Has he attained the seventh degree of concentration? (G.B. Shaw, Heartbreak House, Act 1)

On Tuesday night, I think the Paris Opera’s dancers did.

I start with the second piece, O Zlozony/O Composite physically composed by Trisha Brown. As I expected, those around me alternated between slumping back in their seats and keening forward. The audience dances a connect/disconnect on their part too! Quite often, those sitting react more to the music than to the dance. But this once, I leant forward all the way through because of the way the music was danced to.

I somehow had felt left out in the cold by the first cast I saw on Dec. 6: Aurelie Dupont, Nicolas LeRiche, and Jéremie Bélingard. Perhaps this trio intended to create a mood which could only emphasize my winter? But as I sat there in the warm dark of the Palais Garnier my only thought proved to be about how I would soon have to head out again into a cold and solitary early winter’s night. The trio looked as pretty and as icy and as disconnected as snowflakes. I could swear I saw snow abstractly represented on the backdrop.

But on Tuesday night suddenly van Gogh’s Starry Night seemed to have enveloped the back of the stage as another almost-new cast orbited in response to a sheltering sky and lifted me up and away from this cold world. Straight-faced – as modern/contemporary demands — but not deadpan. Lost in their own thoughts, this trio melted the snow without having thrown any obvious flames in that direction. Suddenly, I didn’t give a flying fuck about the soundtrack’s irritating and repetitive “brrrd.”

1) Aurélien Houette’s subtly menacing brawn added a wryly poetic mystery to the weird aura that Milosz’s poem already fully embraces. He played against the piece’s potentially glacial prettiness. He embodied a man, a man who moves as he wishes, a man of slowly burning fires. A man with issues and suppressed stories to tell.
2) Jeremie Bélingard, who seemed somehow an outsider filled with an unnecessary fire or hope for warmth when dancing with Dupont and LeRiche here found his place. I know, I know, narrative has been out of fashion in modern dance since, like, forever. So Bélingard keeps his marvelously expressive face quite still, as the task requires. Yet the way he moved and physically reacted to both of his willing partners implied that he certainly had invented his own internal monologue. One which both partners – equally concentrated on their own ideas – somehow understood this time around. His every step seemed to stem from some deep logic, a driving force. He wanted to say something to his partners, to us. And the audience heard him.
3) Muriel Zusperreguy made herself as weightless as a feather in these two men’s calibrated arms. Her unselfconscious femininity has already pleased me many times. The way she allowed the trio to turn her into a graceful yet unpredictable Calder mobile made me think “Aha, New York.” She, too (and how do you do that through a relevé?) let us out front know that she might just have found what she’d spent a lifetime looking for: someone(s) she can trust with her life.

This time, instead of random snowflakes, I found myself fascinated by the stately revolutions of three planets: Houette’s Mars, Bélingard’s Mercury, and Zusperreguy’s…Venus.

Goddesses as well could be found in the Forsythe pieces:  Amandine Albisson — whose superbly proud and juicy Venus had made last season’s Ratmansky Psyché watchable – Sabine Mallem and Marie-Agnes Gillot pulled the audience into their orbit by offering up their wide and true port de bras which made them all resemble proud eagles in flight.  Particularly Eleonora Abbagnato (too rarely seen in Paris as of late) seduced the audience with her rallentando swishes of arms fore and aft in Woundwork. When in focus, Abbagnato always proves as energetic and poignant as anyone’s choreography encourages dancers to dare to be.

Perhaps because Zusperreguy, Houette, Bélingard had reminded me to look and listen and trust my feelings I suddenly, thirteen years after the premiere of Pas./Parts, realized why it has always made me feel at home. During Tuesday’s performance, the music, and the dances, and especially the dancers, sent me back to New York during the long summers of years long gone by. A walk on the West Side in the 1970’s would have taken you to streets overcrowded by kids playing jacks or hopscotch or fighting the way only thirteen-year olds know how to mess up. Watching Pas./Parts, I started to hear not only bubble-gum popping, but to realize that I was hearing snippets of all those kinds of music that once had blared from open tenement windows – yes, the cha-cha, but also a celestial albeit random mix of boogie-woogie, polkas, rock, bits of classical…This ballet, even if from 1999, turns every dancer on stage into a potential John Travolta. The entire cast that night, through its youthful and reckless energy, asked us to play jacks with them. I loved them all, but particularly appreciated the live-wire energy of the very young Emilie Hasboun. Like every one the school produces, of course she has spectacularly assured technique. But not all of them seem to attract the eye, to refract the light, and to glow like a starry night. She does.

For me, all the dancers this evening illustrated two lines from a poem so rarely considered nowadays (perhaps because, um, it’s a bit overheated) Longfellow’s Evangeline: Silently one by one, in the infinite meadows of heaven /Blossomed the lovely stars, the forget-me-nots of angels.

Commentaires fermés

Classé dans Retours de la Grande boutique

Tagué , , , , , , , , ,

par | 11 décembre 2012 · 8 h 14 min

To pointe or not to pointe… Is that the question?

WWF

What a piece of work is a man! [...] how infinite in faculty! in form, in moving, how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension how like a god! (Hamlet, Act II, scene 2)

These four pieces were created on the bodies of dancers in the Paris Opera Ballet yet are these “ballets?” Does ballet mean: women wearing toe shoes? Fluffy tutus? Men in tights? Perennial productions of The Nutcracker? Are these four "modern" either, though? The term proves equally slippery, and as rich with clichés. Does modern mean anything anymore when we still automatically call Picasso’s work “modern” and he has been dead since 1973?

Invented in the US and Germany about a 100 years ago, modern dance defined itself against the sissified genre of ballet: rejecting any footwear and seeking a more natural way of moving, these pioneers developed a grounded, earthy, expressive form. Then in the 1960’s, a new generation of “post-modernists” went as far as one could go to eliminate, if not movement, then “dance” from their dances.

The term used much today, “Contemporary,” means reacting to and interacting with current trends in society and art. As in: what “modern” used to mean. [This month’s Dance Magazine interrogation of current choreographers on this subject inspired my musings).

The “modern contemporary ballets” we witness tonight try to defy categorization. By indirections find directions out, as Shakespeare counsels us (Hamlet Act II, scene 1).

By now almost all dance makers have learned to appreciate the way classically-trained ballet dancers understand the use of the body and its weight and its center and its energy. And they love to take chances. If anyone can look good – both ethereal and earthy — while intentionally falling off their shoes, the Paris Opera’s dancers can.

In The Middle, Somewhat Elevated (1987)

Choreography by William Forsythe; Music by Thom Willems. (28 minutes)

The mysterious title refers to just where Forsythe blithely told the Opéra’s management to put those golden cherries (so that’s what’s dangling up there!) when told he had no budget for a set.

But the music will probably bother you more than the title. The composer constructed a “Theme and Variations” out of the sound of a locomotive crashing into a train, along with electronic distortions of his own voice. 25 years on, the opening chord still…no, I won’t tell you, just sneak a look at your neighbor when the lights first blast on…I own a copy of the recording, and play it when I need something violent to get me out of a bad mood. Smashing things – or at least bouncing around full force– can prove quite cathartic, if you stick with it.

Forsythe likes the idea that any part of the body – from your big toe to your little finger — can provide the intitial impulse for a violent cascade of movement to follow. He knows that tension, distortions, weird changes in speed, all challenges can lead us to dance in ways we never thought of before. This ballet (it has girls in toe shoes, guys in tights, no?) breaks movement down in order to let the dancers exult in demonstrating how they have chosen reconstruct it.

The laws of gravity need not apply. You can start from any point or any “pointe,” in order to test the limits of your strength and balance.

For me this ballet illustrates a portion of Hamlet that I’ve always found both perfect and absurd: … there’s a special providence in the fall of a sparrow. If it be now, ‘tis not to come; if it be not to come, it will be now; if it be not now, yet it will come: the readiness is all. (Act V, scene 2).

The dancers are ready.

PAUSE ONLY

O Zlozony/O Composite (2004)

Choreography byTrisha Brown;Music by Laurie Anderson.(25 minutes)

Trisha Brown belongs to an earlier generation (born in 1936 vs. Forsythe’s 1949), yet her imagination fed Forsythe’s just as her own continues to grow and evolve. A founder of the post-modern and minimalist wave one could encounter downtown at Manhattan’s Judson Church during the ‘60’s, her early works often used the music of complete silence.

With the still inventive and chic violinist Laurie Anderson (do a search of ‘O Superman’ from 1981), Brown chanced upon a poem by Czeslaw Milosz. Anderson recorded a Polish actress reading this ode to a bird and began to tweak it in her own way. Each musical section is exactly two minutes long. Brown, always willing to attempt a new way of looking at things, broke this poem down in her own manner too: a trio set against a starlit sky, against which they evolve, revolve, return, float, and come to rest.

The opening section illustrates (distills? cracks open?) the image of a branch still swinging from the heavy weight of a bird that rocked back and forth over great seas of air.

You may get distracted when the composer gets to the poet’s bird sounds: “pta, pteron, fvgls, brd.” Or by trying to figure out how dancers supposedly (according to the program) are shaping letters – including inexistent ones – of the alphabet as they go along.

The woman in this triangle sometimes wears pointe shoes. Could that mean something? I find myself again in Hamlet: see yonder cloud that’s almost in shape of a camel? (Act 3, scene 2) i.e. just let it go…and try not to think too much.

Tonight you will either die of boredom or experience a kind of out of body experience if you surrender to the dancers’ intense concentration and quiet commitment to revolving within outer dimensions of space and sound.

INTERMISSION (20 minutes)

Woundwork 1 (1999)

Choreography by William Forsythe; Music by Thom Willems. (15 minutes)

Wound as in “winding,” not “harming.” For two couples.

Growing up on Long Island in the 1960’s, Forsythe thought that dance meant the twist (and he was high school dervish) and music meant rock and roll. He discovered classical ballet in college, along with the Derrida, Foucault, Barthes…

The music stems from the recording of three clarinets, deconstructed and unraveled.

The piece could be called “roll and reroll.” Or “ twist and detwist.” While at first the two duets seem not to belong to the same place, the more you look the more you realize that one couple’s to- and-fro gets echoed, and mixed up, by the other’s.

Perhaps Hamlet fits these dancers too: though I am native here/and to the manner born – it is a custom/ more honored in the breach than the observance. (Act 1, Scene 4). By breaking some genteel rules of ballet, Forsythe frees the Parisian dancers to stylishly outdo themselves. If you are to the manner trained, is "too elegant"even possible?

PAUSE ONLY

Pas./Parts (1999)

Choreography by William Forsythe; Music by Thom Willems. (35 minutes)

One of the touchstones of modern French literature, Raymond Queneau’s Exercises de style, comprises 99 retellings – in 99 different literary styles – of the same dull anecdote about standing around waiting for a bus. After a while, the absurdity starts to cheer you up.

Here we only experience 20 sequences (parts) put out by 15 dancers who each latch onto micro-segments of a dance phrase (a step, a pas, let’s say “the letter ‘E’”) as they dance into and around each other. After a while, even Hamlet would have started to smile. You won’t believe your ears when Willems’s music devolves into a deliciously perverse version of the cha-cha.

There’s a divinity that shapes our ends/Rough-hew them how we will. (Act V, scene 2).

Commentaires fermés

Classé dans Hier pour aujourd'hui, Humeurs d'abonnés

Tagué , , , , , ,

par | 16 novembre 2012 · 17 h 18 min

A not too biased plot summary of Don Quixote/Quichotte

NB : voir en dessous pour la traduction française.

La scène des Dryades, Saint Petersbourg. Gravure russe.

A minor episode from the second volume of Miguel Cervantes’s novel Don Quixote de la Mancha – “Gamache’s Wedding” – is spun out into a comic evening-length ballet. While the mime playing the Don keeps crossing the stage in his single-minded pursuit of courtly love, the real heroes are two thwarted but resourceful young lovers. This is a ballet of many colors: exuberant stylized folk dances (Spanish and gypsy) contrast with the classical purity of the poetic “dream scene;” and slapstick gives way to an explosion of spectacular pyrotechnic dancing in the final “wedding scene.”

As Cleopold points out, even the choreographer of record re-tooled his original within two years and then again…and this ballet has been added onto and fussed over by each generation and every company ever since. For Paris, Rudolf Nureyev scanned and chewed over every version he could find in search of, for lack of a better word, the truth. He sought to create a dramatically-correct structure that would allow the dancers to feel less silly. By instilling some kind of additional logic into the plot and action (details, really) and adding yet more dance, he reshaped this ballet chestnut into an even more satisfying soufflé.

PROLOGUE: IN DON QUIXOTE’S ROOMS

The mimed prologue brings us into the world of Don Quixote, an impoverished gentleman obsessed with the days of chivalry. We see the exasperation of his starving entourage: his servants and the rotund monk Sancho Panza. While this fat man of God tries to hold onto the chicken he has just stolen, the Don prepares to go out and right the world’s wrongs.

ACT I: A SQUARE IN BARCELONA

The high-spirited and strong-willed Kitri, the innkeeper’s daughter, leaps into view. She is soon joined by the man she loves: the dashing Basilio, a barber. Her father, Lorenzo, interrupts them. He refuses to let his gorgeous daughter marry such an impecunious suitor. Lorenzo has a much better catch in mind: the idiotic Gamache, a foppish aristocrat.

The sexy Street Dancer, joined by the toreador Espada and his matadors — and then by Kitri’s two girlfriends — all entertain the crowd with dances until the Don arrives astride his mangy horse. The earthy antics of Sancho Panza (which consist mostly of looking up under the womenfolk’s skirts) distract the crowd. When Don Quixote espies Kitri, he mistakes her for the sweet and inexistant “Dulcinea,” his imaginary ladylove. Kitri humors the elderly knight and joins him in an old-fashioned minuet.

When Sancho Panza’s unsuccessful attempt to steal a fish creates a disturbance, Kitri and Basilio run away together.

ACT II

SCENE 1: A GYPSY CAMP IN THE SHADOW OF A WINDMILL

Finally all alone in the middle of nowhere, Kitri and Basilio come to realize just how serious their flirtatious love affair has become. When set upon by gypsies, the couple appeals for help. Kitri’s gold earrings play a cameo role. By the time Lorenzo, Gamache, the Don, etc., catch up with them, the young lovers have become unrecognizable in borrowed gypsy garb. Kitri is particularly brazen, jiggling her shoulders and rattling her new fake jewelry right under the noses of her pursuers. The guests are next treated to a puppet show, which tells the story of…young lovers on the run. The Don, always one more step away from the real world, first tries to rescue the puppets but then espies a giant monster: the famous windmill. Challenging it to a joust, the Don rushes to the attack. Even the orchestra goes oooh! The windmill wins.

ACT II

SCENE 2: A FOREST GLADE (THE DON’S DREAM)

We now share the vision that appears to a terribly wounded Don Quixote. He hallucinates that Dulcinea/Kitri leads him to a magic land: the kingdom of the dryads (mythical wood nymphs). Here Kitri, Cupid, the Queen of the Dryads, and a bevy of identically dressed ballerinas all dance only for him. The knight’s idea of heaven turns out to be a pure and abstract classical ballet: a realm of soft colors and music, beautiful tutus, complex geometric patterns, gentle and harmonious movements, which provide the setting for extremely technically difficult solos for each ballerina.

ACT III

SCENE 1: A TAVERN

The bullfighter Espada and his friends are rejoined by Kitri and Basilio, still in their exotic disguise. Lorenzo, et al., also catch up with them. Kitri’s father is adamant that his daughter must marry Gamache – the stupid suitor from act 1 — but Basilio has one more trick up his sleeve. “Distraught,” Basilio “stabs” himself and lies “dying” center stage. Kitri begs the Don (miraculously recovered from the windmill’s conk on his head) to help the course of true love. Her father finds himself forced at swordpoint to bless their union. This, of course. means that Basilio may miraculously recover from his wound. The Don and Gamache decide to finally have it out. (When the guys are “on,” this bit can turn into the Minister of Silly Walks meets Mr. Bean).

ACT III

SCENE 2: THE WEDDING PARTY

No extensive miming of wedding vows here, merely a joyful party where Kitri and Basilio express their relief, like any newlyweds, at finally being united.

We get to see these two burst into a brilliant grand pas de deux, a rite of ballet which follows a template as codified as any ceremony. A bouncy entrance for both. A sudden burst of private emotions brings them together to dance in slow harmony. Then the hero will jump for joy. Then the heroine will begin to trill [When she whips out her fan, start – discreetly – to rub your head and pat your stomach along to the music, to demonstrate just how much you are in sync to this subtle demonstration of technical mastery]. Then they will both try to outdo each other in the final coda but finish having decided that fabulous partnering is in fact the secret to a great marriage.

All on stage join together to celebrate. The guest of honor, Don Quixote, decides to take his leave and sets out in quest of new adventures. I bet that, after today’s events, he will only find boredom.

Un épisode mineur du second volume du Don Quichotte de la Mancha de Miguel Cervantes -les noces de Gamache- est monté en épingle jusqu’à devenir un ballet comique en deux actes. Tandis que le mime qui joue le Don ne cesse de traverser la scène en quête d’amour courtois, les vrais héros sont deux amants certes contrariés mais jamais à court d’idées. Voila un ballet aux multiples couleurs : d’exubérantes danses de caractère stylisées (espagnoles et gitanes) contrastent avec la classique pureté de la scène du rêve ; et la grosse farce fait place à une explosion spectaculaire de pyrotechnie dansée dans la scène nuptiale finale.

Comme Cléopold l’a fait remarquer, le chorégraphe d’origine a lui-même revisité son original deux ans après la création et encore après … et son ballet a été revu et tarabiscoté par les générations suivantes. Pour Paris, Rudolf Noureev a passé en revue et digéré toutes les versions à disposition, à la recherche, en l’absence d’un vocable plus approprié, de la « vérité ». Il aspirait à créer une structure dramatique correcte qui permettrait aux danseurs de ne pas se sentir insipides. En instillant un peu de logique supplémentaire dans le livret et dans l’action (quelques détails seulement), et en ajoutant encore un peu plus de danse, il a accommodé ces restes de ballet pour en faire un consistant plat de résistance.

PROLOGUE : DANS LA CHAMBRE DE DON QUICHOTTE

Le prologue mimé nous transporte dans le monde de Don Quichotte, un gentilhomme fauché obsédé par l’époque de la chevalerie. On sent l’exaspération de son entourage affamé : ses serviteurs et le rondouillard moine Sancho Panza. Tandis que l’aimable gyrovague essaye de rester en possession du poulet qu’il vient juste de chiper, le Don se prépare à sortir afin de redresser les torts qui pullulent en ce monde.

ACTE I : UNE PLACE DE BARCELONE

La vivace et têtue Kitri, la fille de l’aubergiste, nous saute littéralement aux yeux. Elle est bientôt rejointe par l’homme qu’elle aime : le beau Basilio, barbier de son état. Son père, Lorenzo, les contrarie. Il refuse de laisser sa superbe fille épouser ce prétendant impécunieux. Lorenzo a un bien meilleur candidat en tête : le ridicule Gamache, un aristocrate suranné.

La pulpeuse danseuse de rue, rejointe par Espada le toréador, ses compagnons matadors ainsi que par les deux amies de Kitri divertissent la foule de leurs danses jusqu’à ce que Don Quichotte arrive à califourchon sur va vieille rosse. Les badineries rustiques de Sancho (qui consistent en gros à regarder sous les jupes des filles) distraient la foule. C’est alors que Don Quichotte s’avise de la présence de Kitri qu’il confond avec la douce et imaginaire « Dulcinée », la dame de ses rêves. Kitri divertit le vieux gentilhomme et danse avec lui un désuet menuet.

à la faveur du trouble causé par la tentative manquée de Sancho pour voler un poisson, Kitri et Basilio prennent la poudre d’escampette.

ACTE II

SCENE 1 : UN CAMP GITAN A L’OMBRE D’UN MOULIN A VENT

Enfin seuls au milieu de nulle part, Kitri et Basilio réalisent soudain combien leur bluette est devenu une affaire sérieuse. Capturé par des gitans le couple leur demande de l’aide. C’est une boucle d’oreille en or de Kitri qui décide de leur sort. Quand Lorenzo, Gamache, le Don etc. les rejoignent, les jeunes amants sont devenus méconnaissables, dissimulés sous des oripeaux gitans. Kitri se montre particulièrement effrontée, agitant ses épaules et faisant sonner ses nouveaux bijoux de pacotille juste sous le nez de ses poursuivants. Les invités se voient ensuite donner un spectacle de marionnettes qui conte l’histoire de … deux jeunes amants en fuite. Don Quichotte, jamais vraiment les deux pieds sur terre, essaye d’abord de voler au secours des marionnettes puis aperçoit un monstre géant : le fameux moulin. Le provoquant en combat singulier, il fonce tête baissée. Même l’orchestre fait « Hiiiiiiii » ! C’est le moulin qui gagne.

ACTE II

SCENE 2 : UNE CLAIRIERE (LE RÊVE DE DON QUICHOTTE)

Nous assistons maintenant à la vision qui apparait à Don Quichotte, cruellement blessé. Dans son hallucination, Dulcinée/Kitri le conduit dans une contrée magique : le royaume des dryades (de mythiques nymphes des bois). Là, Kitri, Cupidon et la Reine des dryades, ainsi qu’une cohorte de ballerines habillées de manière identique dansent toutes pour lui. L’idée que se fait le chevalier du Paradis prend la forme d’un pur moment de danse classique abstraite : un domaine de couleurs et de musique suaves, de beaux tutus, de figures géométriques complexes, d’élégants et harmonieux mouvements, écrin approprié pour les très techniques solos de chacune des ballerines.

ACTE III

SCENE 1 : UNE TAVERNE

Le Torero Espada et ses amis sont rejoints par Kitri et Basilio toujours dans leur déguisement exotique. Lorenzo & Cie les rattrapent finalement. Le père de Kitri est inflexible dans sa résolution de marier sa fille à Gamache -le stupide prétendant du premier acte- mais Basilio a plus d’un tour dans son sac. « Dérangé », celui-ci se« poignarde » et gît, « mourant » en plein milieu du plateau. Kitri supplie Don Quichotte (miraculeusement rétabli de son mouliné sur la caboche) d’aider la cause de l’amour vrai. Le père se trouve bientôt forcé de donner son consentement à la pointe de l’épée. Cela donne le signal à Basilio pour guérir miraculeusement de sa blessure. Don Quichotte et Gamache décident finalement d’en découdre (quand les gars sont bien dedans, la scène peut ressembler à la fille adultérine des Monty Python et de Mister Bean).

ACTE III

SCENE 2 : LES NOCES

Pas de grande scène de mime pour ce mariage mais avant tout une joyeuse réception où Kitri et Basilio expriment leur soulagement, comme tous jeunes mariés, d’être enfin unis. On verra ces deux-là se lancer dans un brillant pas de deux, un rituel balletique qui suit une routine aussi réglée qu’une cérémonie. Une entrée bondissante pour les deux suivie d’une soudaine effusion les unissant dans une danse de calme harmonie (adage). Puis, le héros saute de joie (variation I). Puis l’héroïne se met à roucouler (variation II) [Quand elle se commencera à agiter son éventail, commencez -discrètement- à vous frotter la tête et l’estomac en même temps, avec panache, pour montrer de la sympathie à cette discrète démonstration de maîtrise technique]. Enfin, ils essaieront chacun de se surpasser l’un l’autre dans la coda, tout ça pour finir par convenir qu’un fabuleux partenariat est le secret de tout bon mariage. Tous se joignent à eux pour célébrer la noce.

L’invité d’honneur, Don Quichotte, décide alors de s’éclipser pour aller vers de nouvelles aventures. Je pense qu’après les évènements de cette folle journée, il ne pourra que se raser.

Libre traduction de Cléopold

2 Commentaires

Classé dans Hier pour aujourd'hui

Tagué , , , , ,

par | 24 septembre 2012 · 18 h 45 min

Very Biased Plot Summary BALANCHINE GOES TO PARIS: IN F(REE) MAJOR

What does an abstract ballet have in common with one that tells an old-fashioned story?

The fact is, all ballets are always built upon the same basic vocabulary of steps. Yet all ballets serve to honor the gorgeous technique that dancers – both artists and athletes — never stop developing. They challenge themselves in order to challenge us.

Ballet could be used to define infinity. Starting from a few positions, ballet frees us to shape infinite combinations. Think about this: only 26 letters combine to create the English language. But just how many ways can you mix them up into just how many words? The OED recently accepted its millionth. And just how many ways can you tease those words into new sentences?

Our audience doesn’t need 3-D glasses. For here they whoosh before us, exaggerating the sensations of being alive, literally carving space out of space: these marvelous dancers, defying anything we could possibly imagine on our own.

George Balanchine’s (1904-1983) vocabulary certainly proved infinite [425 ballets] After fleeing the turmoil of revolutionary Russia, he danced and created works for Serge Diaghilev’s legendary troupe of exiles, Les Ballets Russes. Dispirited by losing his chance to direct the Paris Opéra Ballet, Balanchine left for the United States in the early 1930’s. There he would create a school in order to create his own company. Both continue to perpetuate his legacy. But more than that, he changed the way we think about ballet.

PRODIGAL SON (1929)

Music by Serge Prokofiev

After the Russian Revolution and civil war, Balanchine found himself stranded in Paris. He soon was adopted by the Ballets Russes, whose impresario, Serge Diaghilev, paired the budding choreographer with equally talented musicians such as the crochety composer Serge Prokofiev.

Here we have a chapter from the Gospel of St. Luke stripped down and fluffed up – literally and figuratively – older brother who stays home cut, sexy siren added.

So there’s this cute young guy, fed up with his droopy father – that beard! those ponderous gestures! – and his droopily conventional sisters. He decides to demand his inheritance and go out to experience the world. He vaults over the fence that keeps him from being free in a marvelously airborne moment. (Today he would leap onto a cheap airline destination Barcelona…or Madrid).

In a bar, he meets a bunch of weird guys with shaved heads (what’s so 1929? Go out drinking tonight and take a good look around you). A mysterious woman (aren’t we all) chats him up. She blows hot and cold, wields quite the hat and can do amazing things with her long red velvet cloak. Ooh. This must be heaven.

So is that all that will happen to young college students on their junior year abroad at a bar in some exotic location? Noooo. The following: after getting drunk and seduced they might just wind up stripped and naked and left for poop while their fairweather friends sail away.

What will save such young men, even if literally broken down? That anthem from the Wizard of Oz: “there’s no place like home, there’s no place like…” actually does work, as it turns out. Hitting rock bottom frees you to finally figure out who you really are.

Deeming this kind of linear and figurative structure too cheesy, Balanchine would avoid easy narrative for the rest of his long life. After putting this ballet into the closet for twenty years, Balanchine reluctantly revived it only when the explosive powers of a male dancer inspired his respect: men like Jerome Robbins or Edward Villella. Damian Woetzel kept the flame alive, many of the Paris dancers do too.

SERENADE (1934)

Music by P.I. Tchaikovsky (Serenade in C major for String Orchestra)

Women, like sunflowers, find their faces drawn towards a strong light that bathes them from stage right. Then they remember who they really are, concentrate, and snap into first position. First position is where dance, and a dancer’s life, begins.

Trained at the Maryinsky School in Saint Petersburg, Balanchine was costumed as a tiny cupid in The Sleeping Beauty the first time he set foot on stage. Smitten by the sounds and movement, throughout his career Balanchine never failed to mention his debt to that ballet’s choreographer, Marius Petipa, and his adoration of the composer Tchaikovsky.

This elegiac piece distills the essence of what we think about when we think about ballet, that glorious genre created in France: elegant and mysterious sylphlike creatures clad in long and fluffy tutus who dance by the light of the silvery moon. There is no story – what Balanchine once safely in the U.S. – began to deem, and reject as, “extraneous narrative.”

One of the first ballets Balanchine created in America, Serenade owes many details to the fact that he had to work on a deadline (the premiere would be given at the estate of a financier – and potential donor – in the New York suburb of White Plains). He faced using all the 28 dancers registered at his school. Only seven showed up today? A section for seven. A girl falls down? A girl will fall down. A girl’s hair spills out of her chignon? Guess what. Most of all, music guides the movement. More than that: it frees them to move.

There is a role which dancers have taken to calling “The Dark Angel.” But why? Like the rest of the ballet, the reasons the dancers move to the music seem mysterious and random. If one ballet exists that could be described by Arletty’s legendary cinematic sigh, “atmosphère, atmosphère,” this is the one. In L’Hôtel du Nord her voice betrayed quite the hint of exasperation. Not here. Every person I know who has ever taken a single ballet class becomes enslaved by the beauty of the steps, dying to dance while at the same time choking down a few tears for no logical reason.

Be patient, you non-dancers. Suddenly, at some odd moment, you will fall in love with dancing.

AGON (1957)

Music by Igor Stravinsky

As far as those who grew up in those regions once at the forefront of ballet knew – the one Diaghilev and Balanchine left behind, that part of the world Stalinism turned into a laboratory for the sentimental treacle and ‘6 o’clock’ robotism we now call the “Russian style”– ballet remains defined by semaphored emotions, gymnastic values or, at the very least, encased in elaborate ethnically and historically-correct sparkly nylon tutus.

But Balanchine had moved on a very long time ago.

After fleeing Eastern Europe, my mother, in the winter of 1957, experienced something even more shocking than anything she had ever lived through up until that evening: attending a ballet in New York where men and women danced “practically naked” [leotards and tights] “where you could not avoid being forced to look at their –what is the polite word? ah, yes — crouches” [a LOT of splits in all kinds of horizontal and vertical and 3-D directions].

More disconcerting to her: the ballet fit into no preconceived category. “Almost naked, yes, yet nothing to do with strip tease,” she would always ponder. “The dancers were so grim and serious, as if they were in combat.” She never quite got over the shock, but also never quite forgot how that evening made her begin to understand what freedom could feel like: living full-out, uninhibited, unashamed, playing around with force and speed.

My disarmed and diffident mother was not so far off the mark, for Lincoln Kirstein – Balanchine’s amanuensis – speaks of this ballet in these terms: “the innovation lay in its naked strength, bare authority, and self-discipline in constructs of stressed extrreme movement […] it was an existential metaphor for tension and anxiety.” [Balanchine’s Complete Stories of the Great Ballets].

The ballet, perhaps I should say THE ballet, is Agon.

No frills, no flowers,no moonlight serenades, no distractions. “Agon” literally means: struggle, competition, suffering. Olympics, marathons, each morning’s ballet class, or actually really doing those sit-ups you intended to do after crawling out of bed. That everyday fight between you and the mirror.

Stravinsky’s spiky score plays on and distorts – the way only someone who composed The Rite of Spring could – early Baroque dance forms. Not that it matters. Unless you are a musicologist, I dare you to recognize the 17th century rhythmic references to those rigidly codified dances which the court of Louis XIV transformed into the very first ballets ever performed.

“A choreographer cannot invent rhythms, he can only reflect them in movement.” [BCSGB] quoth Balanchine. But there is more to this piece than that. During an interview on television Balanchine once addressed what could be the potentially boring part of any plotless ballet: “What is abstract? Boy meets girl. This is not abstract.”

Something about this ballet speaks to the attraction of equals. Men and women meet and interact as only trained dancers can do: at the highest pitch. Tell me you’ve never ever felt the tiniest urge to outdo your partner on the dance floor.

Spinoza – please indulge me in an exceptional moment of philosophical pretension – spoke about how true freedom could only be achieved by completely conquering our passions. Dance provides just such a way: by controlling their bodies, dancers free themselves from time and gravity. They simply embody passion abstracted, calmed, teased and tamed. Watching them do the impossible, we join them in tasting what it feels like to be completely free.

Commentaires fermés

Classé dans Hier pour aujourd'hui, Retours de la Grande boutique

Tagué , , , , , ,